Honestly ... I do not get the point of all the aggro. I post on here and enjoy the distraction from **** days, from when Mrs RCL is away etc. It can be a laugh and sometimes really interesting but some seem to enjoy simply pissing each other off. Each to their own I guess. I am uncomfortable with personal info being looked for...the difference between HIAG and Saxton is Saxton put his name, photo and person info on the site so no one had to look for his info but someone appears to have done so on HIAG. Personally I think some on here (including HIAG) let things get way too personal.
But the fact remains HiaG is a wum that would have been banned from any other site. And personally I've no problem with him being a wum BUT...he boasted so much on here that it didn't take much to work out who he really was, especially when it was going on over a period of time and skylarker was supporting the venues he attended down on the South coast. So what did i know without even looking but reading this site, I worked out he played in a band and was a guitarist (not bass) - his biggest giveaway was citing the matter of law, particularly after previous comments about being a solicitor. Skylarker then revealed HiaG's locations. It's a bit like me saying i support a team in blue that play at Priestfield...Even if you're not savvy on football, stick it in a google engine and er what club do i support The same applies to people's personal identity. However, I still insist HiaG's intentions were to get people banned, but it backfired on him so i have no sympathy. He even had the audacity to quote me the law by PM while at the same time posting on here winding up members. So in my view he can go fook himself
I ain't justifying HIAG as I think he and others got too personal and took stuff too personally. I am uncomfortable about looking for personal info on people.
We all know HiaG is not banned anyway, only the username, so i've no idea what the fuss is about either, after all the self proclaimed master wum will already have other identities and i know he's using them
HIAG is a pussy and you've hit the nail on the head about how he operates. He wants a one-way street when it comes to wumming and will try and hide behind somebody with buttons to protect him, because he crumbles when he gets it back. He did it on the Spurs board when I made him cry on his wum thread that went pear shaped, he screamed and demanded that the spurs mods banned me. Then again on here when he got repeatedly rinsed, he'd cry to you about having me banned and when that didn't work, he threatened to take legal action. There's never been a more apt use of the old adage when it comes to HIAG: If you can't take it then don't dish it
I can honestly say that I have never felt any animosity to anybody on here, it's a football forum that is openly about banter, especially the PL board, and I agree I don't see why people take it so personally. HIAG's problem was that he liked to try and wind people up, but failed spectacularly and usually in hilarious circumstances. So that just invited more and more people to take the piss. He couldn't handle it, but also couldn't grasp that he was the architect of his own downfall. I've seen Ginge take more personal abuse on here than anybody else, one of your mods literally called him a Ladyboy Rapist the other day because he has a Thai wife. But do you see him bleating and crying to the mods to have people banned ?
You have a piss easy run in and will win 9 and draw 2 of your remaining 11 matches...do it's definitely yours to lose and no amount of your reverse jinxing changes this scientific fact
**** mate ! I can't believe that you've tried to shoehorn a reverse jinx in there. That is absolutely the most jinxiest thing you could have done. I feel for you now I really do, because I think you might have just ****ed it up for yourself and all your fellow Spurs fans.
... yet you just can't bring yourself to criticise HIAG without tempering the criticism with references to 'others' ...fact is this place is a jungle and if you dish it out you simply must be able to take it too ... HIAG has created more threads about opposition teams and individual supporters than anyone else .. to the point of seemingly working all through the night on his 'creativity' ... he can't really claim any moral high ground after some of the stuff he posted ... it's aim was to enrage others ... whether it actually worked? who knows? ... but there is a karma like irony in who ended up the most enraged of ANY
Threats of legal action, demanding multiple bans, crying behind PM to brb, quoting him legal jargon, making reference to slander, complaining about harrassment, bullying, constantly hitting the report button, sending me PM's threatening legal action, threats to get the old bill involved. HIAG the wum master
I know what you are doing you low down swine...you are trying the old reverse jinx ... that's as low and ****ed up as Sol Campbell's moral compass. Suppose you think that you have one of the greatest minds in football too huh?
Mate, you tried the reverse jinx after I'd already reversed it, that means you've turned it 180 degrees back on yourself. Can't believe you've been so naive to be honest. Unlucky mate
Scores today chaps ? Spurs 4-1 win Chavs and utd to draw Just smoked a nice squidgy hash spliff after a bacon roll with Brown sauce (went for a 6 rasher) just waiting for the game.m now..Nice weekend to be a Liverpool fan
I do not defend anyone or blame anyone I simply observed that some including HIAG got too personal and took stuff too personally. As HIAG is the ONLY poster I mentioned by name so I have no idea what your problem is with what I wrote. I have to pretend I have an interesting life so ain't got the time to play who was worse than who ... and tbh I am too mature to pick who is the worst waste of time culprit on here... But it's obviously you
You really make me hate Liverpool more each day... which is pretty amazing considering the depth of my previous loathing
