For some reason this is what appears on Sean Hannity's website if you look for the article about Obama's portrait please log in to view this image ...probably because, before it was swiftly deleted, this is what the article said. please log in to view this image
Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, has claimed that he paid the $130k in hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels out of his own pocket. Unfortunately for him this probably leaves him open to prosecution for a variety of things and it also makes it a waste of cash. He's violated the non-disclosure agreement that the whole deal was based on, so she's now free to say whatever she wants!
You have to respect a man from the legal profession who gives a porn star that much money for no reason other than kindness of heart.
Very expensive bunk-up if you ask me.Hope it lasted more than 2 minutes! Melania......where were you when he wanted it?
Is it worth mentioning that the second bill the Orange Overlord signed into law was one that removed the Obama-era legislation that refused gun sales to people afflicted with certain mental illnesses? Can't think why that popped into my head today...
I’ve put this on the Prem board. But here’s a Florida student’s response to Trump’s empty platitudes.. “I don’t want your condolences you f*****g price (sic) of s**t, my friends and teachers were shot. “Multiple of my fellow classmates are dead. Do something instead of sending prayers. Prayers won’t fix this. But Gun control will prevent it from happening again.”
.....and a note to all Americans......there will be a gun show near you at the weekend.Come see us y'all.
Guns don't kill people. People kill people! Yes, but people with guns find it much easier to kill people. Pointing your fingers at someone and shouting "bang!" is not as effective.
The pro-gun psychopaths are out in full force, stating that what would have prevented this from happening would be an ex-marine with a gun in every classroom. Ex-marines such as Charles Whitman, or Howard Unruh, or Ernest Ingenito, or Devin Patrick Kelley, or George Hennard, or John Allen Muhammad, or Campos Elias Delgado... Of course, what with education budgets being slashed in the last year, it's funny how quickly these people go from "GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS RAWWWWR!!!!!!!!!" when making their suggestion to "KEEP YOUR HANDS OF MY MONEY REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" when you mention that a tax increase would be the only way to pay for every classroom to have contemporaries of Timothy McVeigh and Jeffrey Dahmer to keep them safe...
This is supposed to be from one of the school shooter's social media profiles: please log in to view this image And I think it's time to repost that NRA video: Terrorists.
Great idea!! . Let’s arm everybody. We can then add extra excitement to your kid’s mundane school day with shootouts between pupils and teachers, and ex pupils against teachers and pupils together. I can see the potential for this. It could develop like Hunger Games, the potential revenue for the networks would be huge!!!.....
Of course, these armed people will always be 100% accurate when opening fire and only hit those Bad Guys With Guns and certainly not hit anyone in the crossfire and/or as a result of a high-powered round exiting the Bad Guy With Gun's body and continuing on its trajectory which may or may not include the skull of a child in the immediate vicinity. But why stop there? Why not install a tactical nuke at all schools, so if a Bad Guy With Gun attacks the school the appropriate measures can be taken and the BGWG can categorically be stopped in his tracks...and will everyone else in a three mile radius, but I'm sure a few criminals will be in said radius so it's win-win?
I believe the Americans kept guns as protection from Indians.I'd like to say that you pretty much eliminated them...what's the excuse today? Do you need a gun just in case your neighbor parks his car outside your house......?
The arguments they come up with are always remarkably self-defeating, for example they say that they need a gun in their house in case a burglar armed with a gun comes into their house - but get remarkably incoherent when you point you that, thanks to the possibility of the home-owner having a gun, that's exactly why a burglar would think they needed a gun before breaking in. Similarly, when you point out that 9/11 proves just how ineffective the NRA's argument actually is, they then try and say that's proof that the next big attack will come from within so they need guns...forgetting that, because of this logic, those attacking the US have guns because people believe guns should be freely available. There's just no talking sense to these people, because talking sense to them seems to make them very angry.
......and if a burglar breaks into your house with a gun,chances are you won't have time to get yours......unless they (USA) go back to the days of Hickok,gun and gunbelt on the waist "ready for trouble!" Do you know,I think many would like that.
No, but I can understand why teachers might need to carry guns to protect themselves in Trumps America. Hopefully someone will shoot Trump, although not even that would get the message through his thick skull.
