Indirect action is not designed to get the pulses racing but, I would venture to suggest, it would cause more difficulties for the Allams than the “caveman” tactics being suggested on here. MoH
Context is everything here. We are talking about a football club, not a nation and regime change. MoH
Point one I agree with. Point two I'm not so sure about as they area few grounds in League 1 I have yet to visit. Point three I have no idea as I am just a hooligan
Then, perhaps, you could point that out by educating us all with the real truth, if accuracy is so important. It’s makes for more informed reading.
I don't think the points you're making are completely invalid, but the fact is protests brought the Allams to the table. They were obviously very concerned about it.
Context is everything here. We are talking about a football club, not a nation and regime change. MoH
Your suggestion would require access to their books, as a forensic accountant is unlikely to find anything in the basic summary accounts that the public have access to and it also works on the assumption that there's something irregular to find in the first place. Current action is merely to increase the chances of them getting completely ****ed off with the whole thing and accepting a more reasonable offer for the club, we're not playing a long game, they'll have ****ed off before the end of next season anyway. Meh.
Jesus Christ. They cancelled the last meeting directly because of concerns about protests. Low grade trolling here. Give it a rest son. PS: apologies, my phone seems to have lost the ability to quote an earlier post.
To make a point he posted bollocks that wasn’t true. I know what he posted wasn’t true. I don’t have any need, or desire, to educate you or others on the truth. It’s irrelevant to the discussion.
Any protest should be accompanied with this music, of course. Stop been **** Ming. It's not a good look.
That’s what they said but by now we should all understand that what they say and do have no direct correlation. MoH
Like you I think MoH talks some sense, but I don’t agree with all of his thoughts; although they do stretch the thinking, which is always welcome. I am strongly against any protest that disrupts the game; for me that is not the way forward. It is very clear to me (and, therefore others) that GB is in bed with the HCAG - why else would he agree to the crass scarves proffering? I found certain parts of his interview contrived and insincere; all a tad glib, I thought. I fully support protests, if folk think them worthwhile, although I have my doubts. I don’t support further dialogue and if GB thinks there is any future in it then he has dropped massively in my estimation - especially after the ‘couldn’t run a bath never mind a football club’ comment; funny yes, but gratuitous and damaging to any future dialogue - it all weeped of insincerity, something we all criticise the Allams for. As for protests bringing the Allams to the table, I think that is only true in part. **** happened, they were surprised, but they reacted swiftly and took control - unless those who attended last night thought they were in control.
OK lets put the boycott thing to bed once and for all, it ain't going to happen because there will be always some who put the supporting of the team before ALL else. OLM has explained the situation about going through the books to find fraud or misconduct.
Any protests that disrupt the game will be no more annoying than VAR. Disrupting the games would be great, getting them abandoned would be better. There should be no boundaries. It’s the West Park marches that I find futile. If a march is deemed necessary then make it to his house on a Saturday afternoon & protest outside it for the duration of the game & every game thereafter.
