She quit because she saw the opportunity (or her solicitor informed her) of the possibility for a massive payout.
Hmmmm. It's actually about being forced to resign due to unreasonable behaviour that breaches employee rights. In her case being singled out for abuse, isolated and demoted while her colleague was not. Her boss, that **** managing you made it impossible for her to do the job she was contracted to do. HIS bosses eventually agreed since they settled for a hefty sum.
Says a lot about his (Diego) character to assume it was nothing more than an opportunity for a pay day.
Now now.... he clearly knows more about employment law than both the employees and multi million pound businesses troop of lawyers that decided it wouldn't be a good idea for the courts to decide. Bit like Klopp not knowing as much about football as him I suppose.....
Spot on Jimmy, Diego's just defending him because he now manages utd, if she'd have ran back off after Maureen ranted at her and the player had been seriously injured he'd have blamed her and she'd have still had to leave her job, he's a prize **** that won't admit ever that he's wrong.
Something that seems to cost his employers a fortune at all his places of work one way or the other....
Yep, 2 of them and I would expect them both to show a lot more fortitude than that and fight their corner instead of going for a payout. If you are right you either want things correcting or your day in court, the money is irrelevant.
Oh it happens but it's still (from personal experience on disciplinary panels) usually settled because some **** up occurred during a process., procedures weren't followed, HR or management didn't keep good enough records about how they handled things etc etc... If all that is done correctly, it's incredibly difficult for someone to make a false claim of constructive dismissal or any other form of descrimination. But that's very publicly not what happened in this case lol.
Constructive dismissal is when you're put in position (literally anything) where you feel you have no choice but to leave despite not wanting to.
Why? She got that. She fought her corner, took it to court and got a public apology and acceptance from her employee that she had been unfairly treated. It wasn't a payout with condition that she say nothing happened. It was Chelsea admitting they failed her as an employer and remunerated her for the loss of position and salary. Why continue on with a court case when they admitted it once they realised she wasn't just after a pay out and was literally about to testify minutes before they caved. Exactly what you expect your daughters to do apparently. ...
