I'm taking Pix at his word, mate. Pix has simplified things, I believe. If Kane is still with us at the end of next season, he pays up on the bet (Bernardos, please, Pix), and if he isn't, I have to pay up to a charity of Pixie's choice. I don't think even Pixie would fcuk around with the lives of little kids, PNP.
Okay, so on the same form as he is now means he has to be the league's top scorer. But to be fair we'll spread it over the last 3 seasons, so his average is 31 goals per season in all comps. So 'on the same form as he is now' means that he has to have scored 31 goals. @Hoddle Is A God
Woah! Woah! Woah! What's all this "form" bollocks? If Kane is still at Spurs at the end of next season, will you be paying £20 to Bernardos - no ****ing about or provisos - yes or no?
Spurs v Southampton: 55,412. Chelsea v Southampton: 41,562 Games that Skiddy's been to in the last decade: 0.
I want a straight answer, Pix... If Kane is still at Spurs at the end of next season, will you pay £20 to those poor kids, no fcuking about, yes or no?
The straight answer is in my original comment. Here it is again because you seem to want to be changing the terms to omit the part about him being on the same form
Imagine that Kane is still at Spurs at the end of next season, and Pixie comes forward with some smartarse dodge that gets him out of paying £20 to orphaned kids - among the most vulnerable people on our Planet! Even the most sycophantic among the 'Pede would disown him, PNP. You'd have to be a special kind of cnut to welch on that kind of bet. Pixie wouldn't do that.
Seems like a lot of outs for you, to me. If he's still scoring the most goals in the country and Spurs don't win anything and he stays? I doubt the bookies would call it that way, let's put it that way.
**** that Piskie you can't change it now it's agreed, form is subjective and would cause arguments It should be exactly how it was placed, you can't add the potential for wriggling especially as you slate hiag for it.
No, Pix. If Kane isn't at Spurs at the end of next season, I will pay £20 to a charity of your choice. You, on the other hand, seem to be saying that if he is still at Spurs at the end of next season that, somehow, you can dodge the bet and deny orphaned children a much needed injection of £20. Is that true, mate?
Did you deliberately miss the part about his 'form' because you want to omit it from the terms of the bet ? I'll give you a sporting chance. Clearly nobody will buy Kane if he's injured or out of form and only scored 10 goals for the whole season. So what would be an acceptable amount of goals to you ?
It was in the original comment I meant it to cover things like him being injured for half a season or totally out of form and only having scored 6 or so goals. So on form meant roughly how he's performing now.
