Not being funny mate, but both sunderland or mags would get bigger crowds than you, if ever there was a sniff a success. In fact they do already, and both are utter ****.
Maybe.
Historically Chelsea were the fifth best supported club over the past 100 years averaging way more than Sunderland.
We were among the best five supported clubs in land in 2003, when Abs took over Chelsea
Man Utd A total of 71,203,271 fans at Old Trafford over the 126 years of the clubs existence. Average attendance: 35,447
Liverpool: A total of 66,385,247 fans at Anfield over the 112 years of the club's existence. Average attendance: 33,376
Tottenham: A total of 58,014,370 fans at White Hart Lane over the 122 years of the club's existence. Average attendance: 33, 332
Arsenal/: A total of 62,784,585 at Highbury and The Manor Ground over the 118 years of the club's existence. Average attendance: 31,550
***CHELSEA***: A total of 55,565,484 fans over the 100 years of our existence: =
Average attendance: 30,853
Sunderland 23,158
Since 2003, Newcastle have overtaken us in all-time averages, due to bigger stadium.
Chelsea have finished as the Football League's best supported club on no fewer than 10 occasions, whereas Sunderland have never finished as the League's best supported club:
Man Utd 34;
Everton 13;
Arsenal 12;
Newcastle/Chelsea 10;
Aston Villa/Liverpool 7;
Spurs 6;
Man City 3.



