Did you listen to his RH evening interview (it was linked on a post on here). I believe he made the comment twice.
The Supporters Committee is not a collective it is a group of selective individuals and group representatives. This elevation of its role does nothing but deliver a false belief. Here is a scenario The club presents a new logo. It includes Hull City and uses only Tigers. The MAJORITY of the committee votes to accept it. Will any of the supporters group representatives support the majority and accept the new logo? The democratic rule has been followed hasn’t it? If the supporters committee is representing the support then there cannot be any protest if the new logo gets introduced.
There's not going to be a new logo selected by the committee, the discussions are about the use of the club's name. It's about social media accounts, web and email domains, use of the name in press statements, club activity etc, it's not about a logo.
**** me I used something to illustrate the point. “Here is a scenario” sort of gives tha HCST are promoting this meeting as them meeting with the club and it is nothing of the sort. It is a supporters committee that they have been invited to sit on. Will HCST bind themselves to the outcome of the meeting? Making this committee into something it isn’t will do no good at all.
He mentioned some "four letter word" thing on his interview with Pete Mills on Hull Kingston Radio the other week. I assume that this is what is being referred to.
Leeds United considered at the age of 61 I am a pensioner and my ticket for Leeds away was £26 and not £39 Cheeky ****s. :-( But in a nice way.
Regarding concessions, Geoff himself pointed out that only he, Barbara and John Williams are there representing the views of groups. Therefore the onus on making suggestions for changes to concessions predominently falls on them. If the Allams wanted a full-on kangaroo court, I doubt that any people representing groups would have been invited. They could have had a committee of youth players, paying spectators, to act as "yes-men".
You painted a scenario that simply isn't going to happen, that was my point. Are HCST promoting this as their meeting with the club? Not that I've seen. Tonight, either the owners will agree to start calling us Hull City and reintroduce concessions, or one or the other, or neither. There's nothing to vote on, there's nothing to be bound to, there's simply their decision on whether they will act to change these things, or not.
Not to me, but then I don't know what the four letter word is (unless it relates to Mark Gretton's mug?). It's certainly the least professional thing he says during the interview.
It's obviously just a joke about 'Ehab' being a four letter word. Still, it was on Millsy's show, so no-one will have heard it anywway.
What idea? No ones suggested that have they? I thought the Club asked the committee to ‘review the guidelines’? That requires the existing ones to be provided for the review to take place ................surely the owners can’t be going back on their word can they?
You posted this on here #565 _ the remarks are in the first minutes , it became quite a little jest between them - it was HullKR FM Radio, not RH, which doesn't change the fact he made silly, gratuitous remarks that directly insulted someone he craves constructive dialogue with. It spoilt an otherwise good interview and was as regrettable as Flaskgate. Disappointing.
