The Not606 PL Board handbook

I tend to agree with you fella. It’s just on a technical point, that unless you have 100% proof, then there is always the chance, no matter how small that you could be wrong.

 

Bobby's nailing this

 

Because there is plenty of evidence to demonstrate that we have made the story up.

Although that said, there was a person called St Nicholas, so maybe Santa did exist after all.

 

Just did a quick search of UK census names ... neither 'HIAG' nor 'Hoddle-Is-A-God' exists in the UK at this point in time - according to existing records

Did find a 'Hoddle-Is-A-Jobbie' ... but no proof that it's the same guy

For the avoidance of doubt and to assuage the paranoids .... I didn't really

 

Rule whatever number we’re up to

Anyone claiming to be average build must produce authenticated proof of the size and weight of everyone in the world

 

We could set up CCTV on your roof and test your theory to disprove it.

I do agree though that the burden of proof lies with those making the claim. The issue with religion is that people who subscribe to it would say that they don’t need to prove it as it’s their belief or faith that god exists.

 

you mean like the evidence that the bible was made up to? and every other religion for that matter .

I don't mind people believing what they believe but this proving/disproving thing is as real as santa and aliens and worm holes and the queen lizardman

 

I agree with you. I think I’ve just argued my own point irrelevant

 

so after all that you agree with us. Cheers Piskie

 

I'm glad we agree

 

Yeah can we just pretend that I didn’t say any of that stuff I’ve just typed

I think it’s because we’re dealing with different paradigms to explain something. As I’ve said, science would say that he burden of proof lies with those making the claim. Faith and religion would say that they don’t need scientific proof as it’s their belief that counts.

 

RULE NO?

Any newcomer must be labelled a sock, Any new women must be offered to @The Liebherr Legacy first

 

They're welcome to say it is their belief, as its patently a belief system and nothing more. The day they prove it's fact is the day that they can say that those saying it's gold plated bullshit based on archaic fairy tales are wrong.

Until that day it remains bullshit, of no factual base whatsoever.

Oh and I said it was last Christmas if he doesn't come back it might be because I've been naughty and have been sniffing beak off a pair of strippers arse cheeks again

 

New rule:

All **** from politics thread should stay in the politics thread

 

If Santa exists then Amazon owe me a tump of money.

 

Yup...and a lot of good comes through religion too...and there is no burden of proof either. I tap into spirituality through my faith, no problem whatsoever. This always comes up...imagine a world full of Athiests...no thanks.

I don't know about anyone else but for me the biggest problem on this planet is the narcissism of Man not the notion of God.

 

Not true really.

Religion v science is a nonsense approach IMHO

Science speaks from when everything started, big bang, a biogenesis, primordial soup etc etc

Religion speaks of a creator making however it happened happen.

Science never said there isn't a creator.

religion caused problems by making the Creator a man with a white beard.

And atheists got together and made a religion of their very own

 

Everyone ignoring rule 23 then?

 

Seems like it.

 

Rule 23?