If Yeovil and Forest Green had qualified for the CL, you'd have had a tougher test. The abiding memory of your qualification is the ease with which you surrendered a three goal lead to Sevilla.
He’s seems to be a genuine character and always upbeat, so is probably a positive influence in the squad. If he was able to convince Poch of his worth, he should surely be a regular ‘box-opener’ when the buses get parked. Trouble is, even last night, he wasn’t convincing by any means. But there’s still time...... just!
Whoa there I sense a lot of fear and anger from you young one, it's almost as if you're bitter that since losing to your good selfs we have pretty much demolished everything in our path whilst your form has taken a nosedive of kamikaze proportions, as the old saying goes You can only beat what's in front of you little luke, I personally can't wait for the draw on Monday. No doubt well have number 6 come May
So here's a quote from last night's Standard (Spurs) did not face vintage Dortmund or Real sides but nor will they play the best Juventus or Bayern Munich teams in recent memory if they are paired with either of the European heavyweights in Monday's last-16 draw. **** right off.
We faced the Real Madrid side that won La Liga, the Champions League, the Super Cup and the World Club Cup. They've never won that many trophies in a season and they retained the Champions League by comfortably beating the Italian champions, Juventus. Ronaldo also retained the Ballon D'or. Not a vintage Real Madrid side? Knock it off, you Chelsea run rag.
So we have to turn out bad teams to make the Standard happy?...or are the Standard Arsenal supporters????
Just a reminder, here's a photo of their editor supporting his favourite team please log in to view this image
Good to see the bitter, Chelsea supporting Tory ex Chancellor remains neutral while editing his paper that is so **** that they have to give it away
His given name is Gideon Oliver Osborne. He chose 'George' to make him seem more 'a man of the people'. However. 'Thunder ****' would have been more appropriate................ please log in to view this image
To call him a tw*t would be unkind to tw*ts No self respecting tw*t would want to be associated with him. Contemptible ****
I didn’t use the term ‘Twat’ - I went straight for ‘****’..... (Has been a trait of my life.....and has proved very expensive..... lol)
