Remain and Cameron had the money,tried to fix the vote and only put one side forward using our money,you never gave the options because you never wanted people to see the options only Remain.
Would you have trusted either side to put forward honest proposals for life after brexit. Also another view to the one you posted earlier, we could keep posting these for years and still be no nearer as to what will happen. https://www.theguardian.com/comment...fits-government-cost-of-living-multinationals
Interesting the police are only investigating to finances of the leave campaign then. More of this to follow but there has been some very creative accounting resulting in a student getting 3600k into his personal bacnk account from a leave backer that was then siphoned into the leave campaign. When it comes to court there will be jail time dished out.
You will be in hiding with vigilantes scouring the streets of Crewe looking for you and other economy wrecking Quislings.
Cameron and his cronies used public money for Remain,should be locked up and the key thrown away.despite this we still voted out,in a fair vote with equal cash for each side to make their case,would have been 60~65% for out.
Would it bollocks. Just like in America there was a backlash against big money and the establishment among idiots that voted for change just to **** up the status quo.r
The weak and scared were bullied by Cameron,but don't get you're white flags out,the brave will see this through to the end of the Eu.
The dim,racist and decrepit were conned by Farage and Boris. Good news you qualified on all three counts.
There's a couple of key points I would agree with in that, (I'd disagree about the ease of negotiations as has been borne out and that a lot of what he proposes could have been delivered whilst by being in the EU and a lot should have been done by the government regardless of Brexit and with this government won't be done anyway regardless of Brexit because of this government). The key point I would agree with is that the work needed to be done now (sensible would have been to start prior to triggering Article 50 - it was one of the key advantages they had and the blew it) but that article was written in January and we're now in December and this shower of ****e still don't know what they want
Possibly but still true https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-refuses-uk-talks-before-article-50-triggered
I didn’t say it wasn’t true. It’s still scapegoating, EU are simply looking after the interests of the 27. Remember the Leave people said they would need a deal more than we would? Turns out that wasn’t true. And now the unreasonable EU are being blamed for our error of judgement.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5150701/Theresa-not-called-Arlene-Foster-Brexit.html So chesh it’s gone up by £10 billion in a day, and to be clear this is the divorce bill and the trade fees will be in addition...
The wheels are off. Even Davis is as good as saying they don’t have a clue how bad Brexit will be but it will be ****. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5151193/David-Davis-says-Brexit-impact-like-2008-crash.html
