Poor reporting. Surely it should have said "...but the anger of 300 fans remain concentrated on owners whilst the others want them to go to home games again so they can thank them for all they have done."
Good article as you would expect from The Times, I guess if AA bought the paper he would just call it TIMES.
'Sign of the' surely? Or 'The Tiger Times' or perhaps '**** off Hull City Council coz you din't let me have what I wanted'.
Announcement at beginning of second half - please welcome back Hull City #89 charon-the-ferryman, Saturday at 4:05 PM sounds like Hull City may have been mentioned more than once - progress - pity only 9000 there to hear it
It’s only progress when the Club say they’ve decided to use Hull City, or change their brand guidelines accordingly Otherwise we’re all left assuming it’s a mistake
they're never going to admit they were wrong - it was introduced by stealth, it will be reintroduced by stealth - then they'll claim nothing's changed, they've always called the club Hull City, we were just mistaken - ie, it's our fault
Personally couldn't hear anything in North stand. Does the sound system need updating or is it the fat DJ who simply shouts?
It was mentioned at the supporters meetings, and the FWG and the Flag meetings. It another of those things being looked into.
Amber nectar article on ACTUAL attendances. http://www.ambernectar.org/blog/2017/11/revealed-citys-201718-attendances/
So, Saturdays actual attendance probably began with an 11? That's shocking ..... but no suprise, and a damning indictment on the Allams. #greatlegacy
