1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Mckenna

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by CityCalv, Aug 22, 2011.

  1. CityCalv

    CityCalv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    215
    Seen a few comments about him and seems like people arnt huge fans of him on here, I personally think that he has been our best player so far this season and he makes the team tick, makes us play, always in space. Without him we seem short in midfield as Cairney, who is having a good season so far, is just not quick enough and doesnt do enough for how good he can be. I like Cairney when on the ball but I think he just has no natural pace about him. Long old season, were just lacking a final ball.

    COYH
     
    #1
  2. HC

    HC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    27
    I'll always give a player plenty of time before deciding if they are any good but Mckenna hasn't done anything to impress so far in my opinion.
     
    #2
  3. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    613
    I WOULD AGREE WITH THIS POST. McKENNA DOES WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN. NOWT FLASH - JUST GRAFTS HARD.
    Good signing for the money he is being paid for sure.
     
    #3
  4. goldentruetiger

    goldentruetiger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    6
    I saw McKenna for the first time on Saturday against Palace. Thought he was good in the tackle win and distribute role in midfield, clearly experienced and some good link up play with Rosenior & Brady in the first half.

    Was very frustrated when Brady & McKenna were subbed, we instantly lost any presence in midfield and failed to really attack their back four after that. Poor subs in my opinion.
     
    #4
  5. westhulltiger

    westhulltiger Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,048
    Likes Received:
    1
    McKenna is a poor mans Ashbee IMO, dont realise what you've got until its gone!
     
    #5
  6. Hutch_Tiger

    Hutch_Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    32
    The thing Cairney lacks that could make him brilliant, is that final killer through ball, nice and neat on the ball but his passes just dont hurt the opposition.
     
    #6

  7. CityCalv

    CityCalv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    215
    I think Mckenna and Ash are quite the opposite, Ash is your big tackler dirty scrappy center midfielder, were as i dont see Mckenna as that, I see him more as a Bullard always on the ball making the team play.
     
    #7
  8. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,002
    Likes Received:
    3,062
    Pearson's substitutions irritate me.
     
    #8
  9. HC

    HC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    27

    I need to keep a closer eye on Mckenna, I've certainly seen nothing so far that would make me compare him to Bullard. Assuming you mean a fit, healthy and motivated Bullard and not the one who looked like he would rather by anywhere else but on the pitch in a city shirt (not that Mckenna is the latter either!).

    I've seen Mckenna as an Ashbee type player but so far he hasn't shown the same level of reading the game and breaking down attacks as Ashbee did throughout most of his city career. It may still come when he settles in the sides and learns the exact role he is expected to play.
     
    #9
  10. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,002
    Likes Received:
    3,062
    As the kids often say - "what the actual ****"?
     
    #10
  11. CityCalv

    CityCalv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    215
    Obviously not as good as Bullard, but plays in a similar way always in space wanting the ball.
     
    #11
  12. HC

    HC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    27
    That's what I am starting to see from Cairney but I don't think that is the role Mckenna is playing and I've certainly not seen any evidence of it. His most important job for the team is probably when we haven't got the ball. He needs to be breaking the opposition attacks down and filling in gaps left by others. That is what Ashbee did well and from everything I have seen is what I expect Mckenna to be doing.
     
    #12
  13. DrPhotosynthesis

    DrPhotosynthesis Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did this guy really just attempt to compare the style of play of McKenna to that of Jimmy Bullard? The worst part is I don't even think he's joking...
     
    #13
  14. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,094
    Likes Received:
    18,093
    On the topic of midfielders, what is the point in Corry Evans?

    Cairney is the technical mastermind, McKenna is everything that's been said above and Evans brings what exactly? I don't dislike the guy or think he's crap, he's a decent player but I just don't see what he actually brings to the team that we don't already have, that's worth squeezing him into a 5-man midfield. You could have another striker in the side instead of him.
     
    #14
  15. CityCalv

    CityCalv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    215
    He is a similar style of player to Bullard but obviously not as good and not the same quality, players can be a same type of player without being the same quality. Shows how much you know about football.
     
    #15
  16. DrPhotosynthesis

    DrPhotosynthesis Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haha I'm only winding you up mate ;) Personally I don't rate him yet but he has to be given time.
     
    #16
  17. MattTheTiger

    MattTheTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    120
    He doesn't offer anything that any of our other midfielders offer. And I'd much rather play Mclean ahead of him.
     
    #17
  18. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,728
    Likes Received:
    76,221
    I'd play Evans at centre back ahead of Hobbs to be honest.
     
    #18
  19. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,094
    Likes Received:
    18,093
    That's what I meant. I know you think he's rubbish and I certainly don't, but I just don't see the point in playing 4-5-1 when you have only two good CMs and plenty of strikers.
     
    #19
  20. MattTheTiger

    MattTheTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    120
    Thats the thing isn't it. There is no point in playing a 451 when we have the squad that we do. We should only ever go into a 451 when Stewarts fit, and even then it's be more of a 433 with Brady, Fryatt and Stewart up top. Atm the only logical formation we should be playing is a 442, because looking at our squad, we have the players that are suited for a 442 more so than any other formation. Drop Evans, put McLean up top and go 442. As the meerkat would say, "simples".
     
    #20

Share This Page