Well I would advise you to read through what you actually wrote again: it is what is known in legal circles as gobbledegook!
is that what it is known in legal circles. learn something new everyday Oh, i wonder how wor colonel Gaddaffi is getting on. hmm bbc news me thinks.
****ing hell, all your future clients are looking at long stretches, if that's the best patter you have. Oops! JUST SAYING!
To the tune of Bob the builder.. z the lawyer, can you defend me, z the lawyer, can I ****e, he's thick as pig **** and he can't write, but he studies at Northumbria, so that's alright! z the lawyer...
Just shows how ignorant you are, who told im you going into criminal law? who told i will be practice law.
Our best chances were the crosses we put across the box - hardly any defence would have stopped them getting over and we needed the fox oin the box to score. You call us arrogant but you obviously think that a "chance" has to be a "shot" which it blatantly doesn't (otherwise Jordan Henderson set up 82 shots last season - which he didn't) It was about putting the ball in the right area which we did but had no-one to score the goals. If that free-kick hadn't gone in (and, IMO it was a decent free-kick but should be stopped by the keeper) then I believe both sides could still be playing now and still wouldn't have scored
How on earth has this stupid article been put forward for news now? Quite glad actually, just shows to the world how bitter some Sunderland fans are.
come on surely you understand that, granted it should be who told you im going. but as mackemsrule realised, English not my first language.