Does a protest group even need a leader? Before the trust did anyone know who was 'leading' CTWD? Not sure I did. It's irrelevant.
Great to see that people can have a free and open debate without it turning into personal insults.... I don't get the point in insulting someone, as soon as you do that you lose the argument. It's why AA lost a long time ago.
You're caught in a lie. Admit it. I couldn't give a **** who is behind it just dont pretend you don't know. Bielby can't just jog along to any meeting without knowing who is behind it and what they're approach is going to be. I've found somewhere his name is identified, it's caught you out.
LOL What? You didn't know who was leading CTWD? So you weren't a member of CTWD, never supported them, and had no interest in what they were doing? Because if the answers are you were a member, you did support them and you had interest in what they were doing, there's no ****ing way on earth could you not know who was in charge of them.
It was wossface wasn't it tadooferry, you know, name's on the tip of me tongue. That bloke with the ace hip flask???
I don't mind being wrong (odd occasions naturally). I guarantee they won't listen or enter into any meaningful dialogue. And when we get relegated. It will be the fans fault of course. All those nasty protests/protesters.
I don't give a **** whose behind it either. I'm sure Geoff does know but it's not important so why should I know or care? Apart from giving you an opportunity to go on one of your usual obsessive attacks, why does any of it matter? You've made out in the past like it's so out of order when people have called the Allams names yet you're here screaming that I'm a liar based on a stupid hunch.
Knew it wouldn't be long before you joined in. I was a massive supporter of CTWD. Didn't matter who the leader was.
Good for you. Would have enjoyed my match day experience, nice and warm drinking coffee but an old age pensioner spoilt it by keeping telling me to sit down and shut up.
