If you go back a few pages you will see Hiag demanding that all bets with Gooners are cancelled, and Spurlock agreeing to his wish. You may need to take your nose out of Hiag’s Arse to look properly
Yes, mate. That's my understanding on the matter. I'm sure that's what Spurlly said. So, even if Pix is right that I purported to "cancel" my bet (which I deny), it won't make any difference. My wager with Pix is live. There is nothing either of us can do about that. And, again for the record, I never intended for my bet with Pix to be cancelled. As far as I am concerned, we are bound in a legally binding wager.
Exactly, mate. Nor can Pix. He seems pretty intent of wriggling out of it, mind. I'm expecting Spurly to confirm that we are both bound, regardless as to what may or may not have been said, and that our bet is live.
Mate, given that Pix is clearly trying to dodge this, this is what I propose. Since we all know that the bet is binding and live, we continue on with it to the end of the season. If Arsenal finish above Spurs (which is highly possible), I will honour the bet. If Spurs finish above Arsenal, we all expect to honour his side of the bargain, and take whatever **** I have planned for him (and it's a lot of ****, believe me!). If Pix makes the ill advised mistake of deciding not to honour the bet... well, I think we all know how that's likely to go down with the lads!
FFS you cancelled all the bets with Gooners, and Spurlock agreed to your demand - thats ALL THE BETS WITH GOONERS ! The bets are all off as you wished so deal with it.
I don't think Spurly fully understood what was going on, or the fact that, he having published our bet in the OP, that our bet couldn't be cancelled. I'm sure that Spurly will confirm that. As I said, it's clear that you are trying to dodge this one, mate, so I propose that we continue as if the bet stands and then see what happens when Arsenal finish below Spurs. For your sake, I hope you honour the bet.
HIAG trying to **** about with the rules. First the bet is on, then it's off, then he wants it on again And all this after he welched on our original bet. Bloke is a proven Shyster. He can't be trusted with any agreements.
Here we go, Spurlock 'didn't understand' You demanded that all bets with Gooners were cancelled and then you demanded that Spurlock confirm that you only had a bet with Archie. It's all there in black and white as I have just outlined. I don't have a bet with you to honour as you cancelled it
Piskie mate we all know what has gone on, and Hiag is just being a prat. Hiag wouldn’t have honoured any bets as he has no honour see my PM
You cancelled our bet and therefore invoke the forfeit in the OP designed to deal with anybody going back on their agreements.
Yes - all dodgy bets with Gooners! I couldn't cancel my bet with Pix, even if I wanted to - which I don't. I don't understand why you cannot understand that? Why would you want to encourage Pix to renege on our perfectly valid bet? As I said before, it's clear that (for whatever reason) Pix is trying to dodge the wager (which I have reaffirmed on more occasions than I can now count), so I propose that we let it run its course, and see if Pix dares to renege, when Arsenal inevitably finish below Spurs, this season. God help him, G4E! You know that, mate.
and there’s the rub, welcher Hiag has realised that by cancelling the bets he has to pay a forfeit - which is worse than the terms of the bet, what a total ****ing dumbass he is
No, I didn't, Pix. And even if I did, it simply wasn't up to me to back out. Our bet stands, whether you or I like or not. I don't know why you refuse to reaffirm our bet. Regardless, let the wager run its course and we'll see where we are at the end of the season. I just pray (for you sake) that you honour the bet, mate.
