There's nothing specific that I can point to and say, "You ****ed with that specific bit of our bet!" You need stop bashing your head against the wall over that issue, Pix, because it's getting us nowhere. It's more the case that you were ****ing with the spirit of our bet. You knew full well what you were doing when you engaged in the ****s and giggles with G4E and his sneaky-bastard bet. For me, and important aspect of any bet made on this thread is that those engaging in the wager do so with dignity and honour. I felt that you breached the required standard, mate. That's all I'm saying. So. Do you agree that all that bollocks with G4E is consigned to the past? If so, I will re-affirm our original bet. It really is down to you, now, mate.
I think there may have been an innocent misunderstanding between us, Pix. Are you prepared to honour our original bet with dignity? By that, I mean, will you refrain from jumping on every sneaky-bastard bandwagon that attempts to **** with the spirit of this thread? If so, then I am prepared to re-affirm our original bet. I cannot make it any clearer than that, mate.
I've already made that clear, Pix. Look. Do you want to re-affirm our bet or not? I'm beginning to get the impression that you are glad to be out of it. If that's the case, fair enough! I'm not going to judge you. Others probably will, of course, mate. But I won't engage in that ****.
You haven't made anything clear. You've accused me of ****ing with the rules, then when you couldn't explain yourself, you accused me of ****ing with the spirit of our bet, yet you still can't pinpoint what that means exactly.
HIAG has cancelled our bet, because he had a little strop over something that he now can't explain. He's accused me of ****ing with the rules and ****ing with the spirit of the bet, yet cannot explain what he means by that. The irony is of course that the only one who has ****ed with the rules and spirit of any bet has been HIAG, when he welched on the original avatar bet. He has now: *Welched on my original bet we made with Luvgonzo *Cancelled our new bet on the basis of some made up ****e that he can't explain *Gone back on his word with the bet he had with G4E *Gone back on his word with the bet he had with Fosse. He is a slimy little shyster that has no integrity or honesty.
He does. By going back on his word (on three separate bets) he now has to change his signature to read 'NOT606's BIGGEST WELCHER 2017/2018' in bold type, large font.
Naaah **** Brb...he's got nothing to do with it. You want to suck his wood you can do it on another thread
@Hoddle Is A God hasnt gone back on any bet that has been finalised so I dont see the problem. He might have decided to cancel his bets...just like @Ginger Marks did. No difference...it wasn't finalised in the OP...so nothing on Hiag
