Betz for Bantz

Okay you know what to do then. Change your sig as per the rules in @Spurlock 's OP.

Don't let the lads catch you welching on this as well mate.

 

#chicken

 

I most definitely would have won it.

That's not the point, though, Pix.

I simply cannot trust you not to wriggle and squirm.

We all saw how you tried to get out of our last bet, and that was before you ended up winning it!

 

Coming from you

Stop flouncing and get your signature changed as per @Spurlock rules in the OP

 

Apart from the fact that you tried to weasel out of the bet when you realised that the avatar change was for the whole season.
It was only after you trying to pussy out of that one that Archers finally agreed to reduce it to a month.

 

Is there any outstanding Betz that I need to put in the OP?

if the participants would care to inform me

Thank you very much people.

 

HIAG has broken his word on our bet, so you can scrub that one.

Also he needs to change his sig as per the rules on going back on your word

 

Which bet has he 'welched' ?

 

Gone back on his word with the bet that we had

 

@Hoddle Is A God

 

There has been no welching, Bruv.

Pixie, as usual, has been ****ing about with the rules, and I have made it clear - on more than several occasions - that I am not going to stand for that **** any more.

If Pix promises everyone on this board (not just me) that he'll play it straight, and that he'll take whatever **** I throw at him (when, inevitably, Spurs finish above Arsenal, this season), then I am prepared to re-affirm our bet.

Well, @PISKIE ?

 

What rules have I been ****ing about with ?

 

It's not so much the "rules" that you've been ****ing with, Pix; it's more the spirit of our bet.

****s and giggles are great, but there comes a time when we have to knuckle down and be serious, mate.

So. Do you want us to re-affirm our bet?

It's just you and me. No ****ing about with G4E sneaky-bastard tactics, yeah.

 

What in the 'spirit' of our bet had I been ****ing with ?

 

Come off it! You know full well what the issue was!

G4E was ****ing about, making sneaky-bastard betz, and you were all over it like a rash, mate.

I won't stand for any of that ****. Not again.

So. Provided that you are prepared to draw a line under all that G4E nonsense, and knuckle down to the spirit of our original intentions, then I am prepared to re-affirm our bet.

Agreed?

 

Our bet had **** all to do with G4E's bet.

So I ask you again, what aspect of our bet was I '****ing' with ?

 

Do I take that as a "yes," then, mate?

 

No, I'm asking you to explain what part of our bet you claim that I was '****ing with' ?

 

Look, the point is, that I am prepared to overlook all the ****ing about that went on between you and G4E, as long as you promise me that you'll knuckle down and honour our original bet.

Agreed?

 

You have made specific accusations that I was '****ing' with our bet. I'm asking you to explain yourself.