I wish you had, i can't be arsed to make any sensible posts on here now, it's all the same arguments that are raging on from 10 pages ago, just put in a slightly different context.
...and it's the same as the last article that did the same, and the one before it, and the one before it.... I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this
on another issue shouldnt you be tina2011 now? unless of course those are your measurements? tina 20 x 10?
I'm sorry, i just prefer to write more serious articles that get a debate started. Rather than which ginger birds i'd do.
It's been done to death, though. It's like the fookin' Magic Roundabout, this subject. But fill your boots.
It's hardly my fault if other posters keep arguing amongst themselves. Look at my last few posts, they've involved 50ft tall dragons, jesus in a car crash etc.
The Quran's explanation of embyology is true today? So man is formed from clay extract, then? I think that the problem here is the websites that you're getting your information from. You read some really biased interpretations of vague scripture and force them to conform to what we know. Look up confirmation bias. Yeah, it's funny how it's impossible to work out what religious texts mean until we know how things actually work, isn't it? You could almost say that they're so vague as to be meaningless...
I've heard Muhammad mentioned a few times on here, mainly testaments to his wisdom and foresight. Didn't he have a 9 year old wife, Aysha? That's not particularly wise is it?
I know, he'd have to put up with the whining, the temper tantrums etc. I've got 2 younger sisters, trust me, i'm an expert.
yes the qurans explanation of EMBRYOLOGY is true today. check it out scientists claim matter came from dust and water dust + water = clay tbh honest the website bit is you trying to 'get your own back' because of earlier. I am giving you verses from the quran in direct response to your questions, how is this confirmation bias the problem with these debates is that this is where they lead, into sillyness like confirmation bias and its meaning The religious texts (in the case of the quran) have never been changed, it is common sense that th ediscovery of the waters not mixing was only found by science recently due to not having equipment. This affirms my points rather than detract vague and meaningless are just words? its like me saying the theory of evolution is a theory, as is relativity. not facts, but as their title implies theories
