Religion is Bullsh*t, Get over it, and support science.

I agree, so you have to go by the evidence available, which suggests that the big bang theory is the most plausible explanation that we currently have.

 

please log in to view this image

 

But it can't be proved conclusively which proves my point!

 

What if we don't believe in politics

 

Good one, you can't prove me wrong though.

 

It can't be proved conclusively at the moment, no.
If you're going to apply that logic to everything though, then you'd better stop believing in god.

 

I'm not saying the Big Bang theory is wrong. My point is that Science can't prove whether God does or doesn't exist (despite what I have heard some people claim in the past) and my belief is that God is the driving force behind things, including the "Big Bang" or any other way that the universe may have come into existence.

 

You really are a ****ing moron. Your statement is not one that can be 'proved' or 'disproved' in the popular sense of those words, but that doesn't mean it isn't WRONG and MORONIC.

 

So you can't prove me wrong but I am wrong

 

If you have a theory about something it's up to you to prove it's right. It's not up to others to proves it's wrong.

You have zero evidence to back you claim therefore people are right to dismiss it as mumbo jumbo.

 

This is why people created things like the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Russell's Teapot.
You can't disprove either of them, but that's not evidence that they exist.

 

I said that no-one can prove conclusively whether God does or doesn't exsist.

Is that wrong then?

 

No one has to prove the existence of something of which there exists no evidence.

 

You can't prove that I'm not god either, but I doubt that you believe that to be true.

 

God dizny do internet.

 

All I was saying was that I have heard some people in the past saying that Science proves God doesn't exist, when it doesn't.

 

Look, if god was real, would he allow all earthquakes and tsunami's etc. to happen? If he would, then he is one sick bastard.

 

Prove it.

It depends upon whether you believe that an absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
I don't, but I also don't believe in things that aren't supported by any evidence.

 

There is NO evidence of a God. Science has no need to prove the non-existence of a being for which there is no evidence he or she exists.

 

That's not what I said though is it ****tard.

You've set your own little definitions of 'proof' by saying "The Big Bang can only be proved conclusively if you travel back in time", which is the most ******ed thing I've ever heard.

My point was that you are making unreasonable demands which are impossible to meet, and then using said failure as evidence that your view that 'faith' is required in Science and The Big Bang is correct. You are a moron.