Betz for Bantz

So 3 bets and only 1 survives to go into the OP

Goons/Chavs to blame.

Let it be written

 

Random pic of defeat, confirms that you have a guilty conscience mate.

 

Shocking amount of pussy holes on here.

It has been noted

 

We can put it to the people of Not606 and debate this tomorrow.

I reckon Sky should be the referee.

 

I am not a scoundrel old boy I am just too smart for you, take the bet and be a man - the odds are in your favour so what's to lose (apart from your avatar for one little month)

 

I think that bastion of decency @brb should decide and he would be totally impartial

 

This

It's a perfect opportunity for HIAG to redeem himself. He will take the cowards option and bottle it though.

 

HIAG when he learns that you've handed him a pussy hole get out of jail card.

please log in to view this image

 

Choosing an inside man is a good move to get the result you need so badly.

 

Thought he only played the pink oboe?

 

No surprises here, 63 pages producing only three bets. Bell doing what Bell does best! Welching on every bet that comes his way...so predictable!

 

I bet that Hiag welches on my original bet.
Terms & Conditions (the small print) are that the loser of this bet has to use the avatar of the winner's choice for 1 month*
How about it @Hoddle Is A God ? Do you accept this bet, or don't ya have da stones !



*scenarios explained:
so if Hiag honours the original bet I will use avatar of his choice for a month and if Spurs finish above Arsenal he will use avatar of my choice for a month, if Arsenal finish above Spurs then I will use avatar of his choice for a month.
so if Hiag welches on the original bet then he has to use avatar of my choice for 1 month.

 

I don't need any results....I'm just playing by the rules. That's why you had the choice to back out and you did. Not a word mentioned since. I suppose I could try ramming the bet down your throat and try and try for the next 63 pages

please log in to view this image

 

Sounds fair but we are talking about a thing that has zero integrity and previous so I would say no chance. You can't teach a dead dog tricks mate.

 

But the we agreed to disagree on terms quickly enough without wrangling. Shame others can't honour their bets after both agreeing though.

 

Your original bet is in your head...Hiag dont want your bet.

He wants a straight shoot out...he always did. Just like I did then you came up with your 'I'll try to be smart' bet. I figured it out and looks like Hiag did too. Let's hope you can figure it out soon enough and realise it's not the bet all parties have agreed to...only all the parties in your head.

Ffs you only proposed it, he declined, why you ramming it down his throat? Make a bet with @Ginger Marks looks like you two are pretty certain with the rules(not).

 

No need to bet with the Arsenal boys as they are level headed geezers about their football having had success. Looking at the bets so far it looks like people are clambering for bets with teams that are strangers to silverware.

 

Because G4e worded it in a way that needed a double check...a bit of a hang on what's he actually proposing? Double check and sifting through the wording.I know that because he did(tried) the same with me. G4e knows and we all know that hence G4e coming out with 'in a court of law...bla bla' lol give over.

If it doesn't work both ways **** it...but G4e wants to throw Hiag under the bus using his 'court of law blah blah' ****.

G4e tried to trip man up but it didnt work....he might have to find another fool