If i recall you were the fella who said after your defeat to the Saints - that you had never seen a more unlucky 3-1 deafeat. Even though EVERYONE and i mean EVERYONE else had just seen you get embarresed. So dont take any offence when i say that i do not have any confidence in your opinions on anything football related!
I think you'll find I apologised and explained myself on the Saints board, so if you don't mind I don't care what you think either.
You apologised for having an inaccurate opinion on something we all saw with our own two eyes. Im not suggesting you didnt do the right thing and apologise for a poor attempt to WUM. Im just saying that expressing such awful opinions makes everything you have opinion about, i.e. Kasper, most likely complete and utter BS
It wasn't an attempt at wumming, and nor was it my true opinion, it was an attempt to stop my fellow Leeds fans acting like it was the end of civilisation and not just a football match we lost. I think you'll also find my opinion on Kasper is the same as every other Leeds fans.
No Andy, you got banned for trying to piss the Hull fans off, no matter how you try and sugar coat it. You were clearly annoying them and were warned. It's the same for these Leeds fans, they've all come over because we've lost and they want to revel in it, so they should keep their toys in the pram when their posts are edited for a bit of fun. In future I will not make the mistake of thinking Leeds fans can take a bit back (come on, lets not make out it was a serious decimation of character), but posts will be deleted if I feel they are an annoyance to Leicester fans. People can hardly complain about that, you can always stick to your own board.
Maybe so, but at the end of the day it's still their board and if they don't like you, they don't like you. They can talk about any team they like, that's not against the rules. I'm sure originallambrettaman will say you were going over the top and ruining several discussions. Frankly, I don't really care, but the point is I think you'll admit you enjoy a good wum (as your ex-sig suggested ) This being the case if you are moderated by another board I don't think you can really have any complaints. I'm not telling you, or advising you not to wum, I'm just saying you should know what to expect if you do
get fooking gally off. hes got no pace, cant cross, no strength, no urgency, falls over alot, moans at every decision, no passion,cant defend, doesnt track back, doesnt shoot, needs to pass quicker and by the looks of last nite cant shoot. he also has no vision but he can cross side to side, which is what i think sven likes about bit. DROP GALLY, GET DANNS!
But Danns has been **** as well. I'm struggling to name 3 players that played well last night. Gally can cross, does have vision and can shoot. He was just a pile of **** last night, as most of his teammates were. This is far more than just one individual, or few. For us to have that many playing badly there is clearly a lot more wrong, and Sven needs to sort it out.
Whey Emilio is being a massive bellend and following in DMDs footsteps. Obviously our view of Schmeichel isn't as valuable as yours because we're "just bitter". You're seeing from him everything we saw last season.
Ye, he was last year before we'd seen anything of him. He was decent for about 3-4 games. Then he showed himself to be distinctly average at best. We learnt first hand and now all your lot refuse to believe that we've been through exactly what you're going through, except for you its worse because he's not having a good start.
i can see where your coming from but what can danns do in 10 mins. gally had 80 mins to prove himself and when he got the chance he fooked it up. he got pushed of the ball to easily and DIDN'T TRACK BACK. i know people like him but with wingers you need pace and gally aint got that. and i agree dyer played **** as well, as did st.ledger and peltier, and nugent until he scored then everyone thought he was the best player on the pitch. changes next week should be: DANNS for GALLY = had a shocker MILLS for ST LEDGER = bad game, mite be a one off SCHULLP for dyer = did fook all but run down the ring and put a ****e/alright ball into the box
haha, I only put that as my sig because I turned out to be awesome at something I didn't plan on being haha.
I thought he tracked back plenty. It was everything he did on the ball that was shocking. Danns was poor on Saturday and didn't do much against Coventry. Yes he was played out of position but he still could complete simple passes, ran around like a headless chicken into blind alleys and couldn't cross. My point is almost everyone is playing poor at the moment and you can single people out all you like, but the reason so many individuals aren't doing it is because Sven can't get them to play as a unit.
