Hmmm...that ain't Russell Grant, and I seem to remember Harry Potter was a lot thinner. Just sayin'. please log in to view this image
But it must surely be a positive thing that the owner of the club he supports has taken the course of action that he has recommended. If he believes his advice is good and he is very knowledgable and clever he must see this as a positive The only way he could see it as a negative is if he feels he knows nothing and talks ****e. What is it glory a positive or a negative?
It should have been done long before now, and our squad should have been sorted and settled before game one. Thats another Cellino trait. Thats Rads fault. Its hardly a shock Wood was in demand. Now follow the money. As a sideline TC was promised by Rad as late as Tuesday that Wood wasnt going. I wonder what his next move will be. Not bothered cos he is out of his depth but its more of the same...
Is it a positive or negative that he has followed the course of action you recommended. He should have sold him earlier? How. Where were the offers? Where was woods transfer request. Or should he have gone around hawking him to various clubs?
Its an inevitable consequence of not emphatically saying not for sale. Its a negative that having built the team and playing style around wood we let him go at the 11th hour. Is it a positive or a negative? It depends on what our replacement strategy is and on if you think wood was likely to take us up with his goals. I am not convinced wood could have repeated last sasons tally so I understand why we have sold, but it should have been done before now.
I ll Try 1 more time. Is it a positive or negative that the owner of the club you support follows a course of action that you believe is the best course of action to folllow?
SO YOU THINK WE SHOULD HAVE SOLD FOR THE £12MILLION INSTEAD OF THE £20MILLION.can see why you emptied bins.
No we should have got nto the bidding war as soon as Rad decided that Wood was going... That didnt happen this week or if it did then Rad is clueless.
