1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

New Signing!

Discussion in 'Newcastle United' started by NUFCtomw362, Aug 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Grem1983

    Grem1983 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    The window dont close till 5pm on the 2nd Sept
     
    #81
  2. StoneyNUFC

    StoneyNUFC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    0
    This.

    Seems unlikely.

    Harper and Krul should be sufficient, both excellent. Forster can probably be recaled and Ole as last resort, who looks very promising anyway. Arguably our strongest area.

    Unless they expect to sell one of our current crop.
     
    #82
  3. Grem1983

    Grem1983 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    The only way we would be able to recall him would be if there was no fee involved, can you see Ashley letting him go for free?
     
    #83
  4. P.T.N

    P.T.N Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,562
    Likes Received:
    3
    Tony Caig. Version 2
     
    #84
  5. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    601
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really cant tell what the huge fuss is over this. Being a NUFC fan is embarrassing at times.

    Signing a reserve goal keeper has no effect on signing a striker or a left back. Stop whinging.

    It also means nothing to Krul, Forster or Harper. IF The transfer goes through, then the only person it could possibly effect would be Ole Soderberg.

    Forster obviously cant be recalled whenever we please. You dont sign a keeper on loan for a full season with him being the #1 choice, with something as stupid as that in the contract.
    Krul is our #1 keeper, or at least he is until Harper recovers from injury and then Krul makes mistakes to let Harper back in the team.

    With Harper having injuries quite regularly over the past few seasons, theyre just bringing a back up keeper in as worst case scenario. It just means Soderberg must be rated too highly by the staff, even though they claimed the opposite at the end of last season when he was on the bench. Calm down.
     
    #85
  6. Marvo

    Marvo Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    13
    Not necessarily true. There are reasons to be concerned about this, but not to the level that some people are.
     
    #86
  7. Tinker Raylor Soldier Saylor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2011
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we're in the market for a keeper WHY THE **** didn't we re-sign Given? I've been patient with our transfers this summer but spending on a keeper when we have many already is ****ing stupid
     
    #87
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page