that is the question.... I think it is spurs as tobes says but i just wonder about the fee thats all.
right lads. net spends this list is not everyone but its interesting Chelsea -15.5mil spurs +72mil in thier back pocket City -216 mil... yeah thats 216... net spent LFC: 35mil Arsenal: -36.5mil Utd: -140mil. Everton +7.5mil Southampton+7mil bournemouth: -31mil Leicester: -48mil Stoke+ 25mil Hudderfield -38mil IMO three things stand out. 1. spurs are cash rich and have a small squad. Their first 11 is good but... they are gambling on bargains 2. City are trying to buy the league.. no surprise there. As are utd. (LFC fans are jealous and want to spend 140mil on two players) 3. stoke are seriously boned if they don't get active. Seeing the smaller teams spending upwards of 35mil is frankly... well... the way the game is going and it drive wages up as well. Evertons business is there for all to see and remains unfinished as we are told.
swansea can't replace him but have also a flat (maybe 750k intake) net spend so don't need your money. If sigurdsson wasn't forcing the move they'd just flat refuse you. he's contracted to 2020 so thats prob where fee comes from. I reckon you will get him and then they will imo be one of several favourites for the drop as per usual. swansea got that abrahams guy form chelsea on loan and have llorente so need delivery to them so i really don't know who they will replace the guy.
If we sell Couthino and Sahko, Moreno et al we'll easily be top of at least one table....or is that top of one table, at least? unless Spurs sell Rose and Dier of course, then we'd have competition.
Sadly have to agree. Sig is quality - Barkley used to be ****ing quality (in today's market prices, if you had the Barkley of 2014, he'd be worth more than £100m for Carlton Pogba).
well... I think if you had lukaku still he would be ace taking set piece and crossing to the guy. so IMO it only works if you buy a striker for him to play the ball to. He's very very good for swansea.
Just listening to Danny Mills saying that Carra has 'Liverpool-tinted spectacles' for saying that he believes Ford will stay, at least for this year. 'If Barca call you have to go', being the logic. But hang on, Carra wasn't denying the player would like to go, or even that Liverpool won't eventually sell him: the issue, that Mills seems oblivious to, is that Liverpool nowadays are cash rich enough to say no, as are most Prem clubs now. Indeed, PSG told them to **** off over Verrati. Certainly, the days of being butt-****ed as we were over Luis are over. Mills reckons that ultimately the player has all the power - well up to a point, but as we now see with VVD and hopefully Ford, that doesn't mean, if a player 'becomes' unsettled (like Masch did acting under orders from Barca), that Barca can get them for cheap. As Comolli says, Prem clubs can simply say no to that now - have Barca (and FSG too) got that message? So you're wrong Danny, at least about saying the player holds ALL the cards: the selling club in the Prem don't have to roll over and sell at knockdown prices anymore, and that is Barca's MO all over. Also means that if and when VVD moves, Soton can get £60m for him (probably not from us the way I see it now), or simply say no deal. Certailny, we can - do FSG have the balls?
