I get why OLM and Cortez want it locking - the narrative of Tymon being forced out seems to be on the slide and the real main reason is taking prevalence. But why would you? If it gets locked then, as the moderators are seemingly 'up for' locking it, then it's truly not 'our board' as claimed.
to be honest, I am more heartbroken that he has decided to leave guaranteed first team football, to be (at best) a bench warmer.
When has he ever been forced out? This honestly gets worse. Argue amongst yourselves. I'm done with this petty squabble.
Christ owt like that and the sheep are usually on here taking the piss and saying how **** it is. Not a peep. Strange It's truly **** that. You might just find out money isn't everything josh.
Correct me if I'm wrong then: It has been said that: His contract offers have decreased in value upon each offer. He didn't actually have a contract offer to consider, in the end. If these were true, it could constitute being forced out of any job - hence ...
Let's move on from Tymon. He's ****ed off. I reckon both sides are lying. I think the Stoke move is a very poor choice - he'll be playing reserve team football - if that's the sum total of his aspirations - good luck to him. I don't believe he ever had any intention of signing a deal with City - He's used the stringing along technique to perfection. No doubt under instruction from his agents.
I'm gutted he's gone because he's potentially a great player. But all this crap he's writing on twitter is utter **** but it seems to be the modern way. He's signed for Stoke U23's for goodness sake. Not Man Utd. The biggest travesty of it all is that we haven't got 3-4 million for him. Another thing that riles me is it's Ehabs ineptitude to why Tymon played so many games anyway. Because last year if he had done his job right he should of been no where near our first team in the Premier League. This makes it more alarming to the point why no contract had been offered. Good luck to Josh but I'm a Hull fan I won't be following his career anymore and won't care how he ends up either way.
Indeed I note that he left City and the club will agree a fee with who ever he signs for? We all know it was Stoke, so what is this about? Something legal I suspect