Shouldn't that be " our" hell then? Besides God is merciful and wouldn't do that to Spurlock ie hell and you
The reality being what? Your forgetfulness? You should write him and ask for a debate, am sure he won't deny the request out right, usually let's his students practise on nobodies Come to think of it he did offer to let his students debate with some of those in your link earlier. It was a question asked at one of his lectures in a stadium of thousands and shown on Peace TV, a channel he set up
Nah, laughing at him being down there wouldn't be hell for me. I've had a bacon butty or two, so seemingly I'm off there anyway, but I won't have wasted my three score and ten in the mean time. There's plenty to show that the god of your book isn't merciful, we did that one earlier, along with the powerful and knowing guff.
You keep claiming forgetfulness, but you seem to forget that you failed to disprove my claim that you follow a bastardised version of paganism. He's barking. I thought he was there for comedy value, and you seem to see him as a role model.
Oh I don't know between this thread and the politics one you wasted plenty IMO All I recall from earlier is you having a mare and being laughed at, with your memory though am sure you believe what you just said
A mare? Okey doke. Have you forgotten you've spent days wriggling and evading, and have now finally had to resort to blatant lies in a feeble attempt to cover the fact, you follow a bastardised version of pagan religions.
Your inability to keep up or provide evidence isn't my forgetfulness but your flights if fantasy have been explained to me by a few on here Now you've ignored my analysis on Naik to GM and are insisting he is my role model, proving them all right again
Aye those lies that I gave you days and times for? So much so that you cried about an apostrophe? Aye that damn wriggling and evading eh
You've offered no real analysis, other than to say you rate him, but recognise he makes mistakes. Given your failure to debate the points raised, which has left you having to accept that you follow a bastardisation of pagan religions, I don't think that's much of a statement.
Days and times, that confirmed and clarified that I was addressing the point that you'd struggled to raise, as you were trying to avoid it and the other questions, and that that ably demonstrated that you couldn't offer any rebut to my points, which means you accept that you follow a bastardised version of paganism. You really are making a fool of yourself here.
This is what he does....round and round in the hope that you tell him to **** off out of tedious boredom so that he can claim a victory of sorts. Same story on the politics thread
Sadly for your claim, I keep on repeating the point, just to keep it on track, as you and your fellow half wit seem desperate to shift it elsewhere. Your usual tactic of tedious abuse that causes people to yawn and drift off, or get abusive back just passes straight on by. You could always help your buddy out with the questions he's struggling with, the ones about the pagan origins of many of the traditions.
I don't have to remember, the posts are still there, although I'm not sure which particular quote you're talking about, as you've quoted yourself. You could always have a go at offering some evidence to support the claim you've been making for days...but you won't.
My abuse is strategically angled. He doesn't need help, he's answered your questions and has taken the piss out of your loaded ones and rightly so
Again? It only ever existed in your mind, as a poor excuse to bury your failure to disprove that you're actually a pagan. No wonder you're confused.
