I know your English is poor, and you tend to ramble a wee bit, but I can't see how that proves that the pagan tradition you asked about, was ever abrahimic.
It's similar to sa'i, and associated with the question on it's paganistic qualities that you're desperately trying to avoid.
Well that's not a very christian attitude. It rather looks like you're conceding, and accepting you've been conned with a bastardisation of paganism.
A christian is the follower of an alternative, more peaceful bastardisation of paganism than the bastardisation that you've been conned by. It's cool this, it's like being a missionary educating heathens, only without the lies.
A Pagan is someone holding beliefs that are outside of mainstream religion. Although there are other definitions.
Is missionary a person or a sexual position? Its hard to understand you Isn't heathen that fat wench who got killed in EastEnders? Be clear man
It's clear you've conceded, and can't find any proof that you're not following traditions of pagan origin.
No I think people quickly come to the conclusion that you're a ****er therefore all proper debate ceases, **** knows how you manage to get so many responses on the Politics thread Edit: If one subtracts the posts where you are getting your arse handed to you on there, I suppose the responses are a bare minimum there too lol
I'm guessing you've given up on the quid pro quo thing, and are just desperately trying to bury your embarrassment, without realising you're simply adding to it.
