I'm neither hiding nor frustrated and I'm clearly arguing my corner. Try answering the question. How do I benefit from that suggestion?
I'm disagreeing with you too, because you're hiding behind bullshit. Stand your own corner, or **** off.
So which theists say supernatural and non physical Because you haven't answers that, or link to where you have
You're disagreeing with me about the similarities between you and Fan. That's another matter entirely.
Abrahamic ones. I said it in the post that you called a rant, which demonstrates that you didn't read it.
You benefit because it changes the subject, and is irrelevant. If you believe he is being obtuse, post the questions in a way that gets round it. Don't just use it as an excuse to post snide, inaccurate bullshit. It just makes it look like you're limited.
Which abrahamic theists say supernatural and nonphysical? Be specific now not just supernatural but both Jews Christians Muslims? Who?
As I've already pointed out, that's a separate discussion. I thought I'd made it clear by the use of parentheses that I meant it as coming from the same side of the argument. A little too much for you to understand, clearly.
Go back and read the comment. I've gone over this. I'm not repeating myself so you can dodge it completely, again.
It doesn't change the subject. I addressed the subject in the same comment and haven't moved from it. You've even recognised the similarity yourself, as you're defining it now.
As this seems to have been skipped. I assume the previous yes is the answer to the second question on omnipotence and omnibenevolence, So: If God is unable to prevent evil, then he is not all-powerful. If God is not willing to prevent evil, then he is not all-good. If God is both willing and able to prevent evil, then why does evil exist?
I have again and you haven't gone over it at all Remembers supernatural and nonphysical Where have answered that?
