World war 3

The point I'm making which you loony left are ignoring is,if it was a right wing guy following shouting abuse,you would be saying lock the racist up,because its the other way around,its ok and the guy being verbally attacked,its his fault the law should be the same for all.

 

That's not true

It's simply wrong

the guy TR beat up may be an ultra right winger by the way, we don't know who he is, TR is a minor public figure (like it or not) and that's the only reason this is not just another couple of people misbehaving at what used to be a classy event

You are just making stuff up here

 

And yet the whole post and discussion is about the TR guy somehow being out of order,why aren't we discussing say loony lefties attack TR again ?

 

Because we don't know he was a lefty and we don't know who attacked who, other than the actual fight

This is boring

 

Of course he wasn't and the rioters weren't last night either were they.

 

He could have been a right wing nutter, you have no idea

 

Where's Corbyn today ? Thought he might be condemning the looters robbing stuff and attacking the police.

 

Would you like a bet on it,sure it will come out.

 

Does not matter, the point is right now you have no idea you are just raising one thing after another to make the debate something other than the fact that TR had a fight at Ascot. That does not happen to 99.99% of the people who go there

 

You are now boring me. Won't be commenting further on this.

 

Thought not 99.99%of people don't get attacked regularly,he does because he refuses to cow down to the lefty nutters.

 

Could this thread be archived somewhere ? politics and religion should not be discussed in polite company, am I assuming a lot here ..............

Anyway only a few weeks before we can discuss real issues again..............

 

I'm racist against green.......

 

Maybe "likewise" may be an appropriate word 2020......

 

So you digest varied and different sources of information in order to arrive at your conclusion.

In short, it's a matter of opinion then......

 

Yes it's all opinion LL

Opinion based on either:

1. Sourced from a widespread range of viewpoints likely to help someone arrive at a balanced position
Or
2. Sourced from a few publications that agree with you plus done weird websites of the alt right

 

Its pointless arguing with this lad he sees anything he disagrees with as a " loony left" plot.

 

I'm not the one that's obsessive, Leedsloser!

Oh, and I see that you can actually respond to my posts, but oddly enough, it's only when you have some more of your racist guff to promote. What happened your standard responses, which appear to suggest that you have an anal bestiality fixation?

Why should I reply to your treatises when you don't do me the courtesy of responding to mine?

Would you prefer if I posted a picture of an animals bum so you can go have a tug over it?

I think my responses have already been posted by 2020, and very sensible and objective they are too.

Funny how Tommy the Tit had the bus drivers name come up when the driver called him, eh?
Funny how the driver wouldn't allow him on the bus & he had to make his own way home, eh?
Funny how the bus driver stated clearly in the newspaper that he didn't see who threw the first punch, yet your 'analyst' effectively claims that it was the other guy.
Funny how we saw Tommy the Tit keep laying into the guy when he was totally defenceless.
Funny how we don't see the other guy lay one punch.
Defending himself? I don't think so.
He's simply underlining the fact that he's the thug that he always has been.
And you fell for it. Again.
Totally indefensible behaviour on his part. And yours.

 

Usual Chesh. Why use facts when fantasy tells a better story.

His family were already on the bus, so no need to 'defend' them.
How do you know he was abusive? It could well be that the chap was saying things that Tommy the Tit didn't want to hear - which makes it abusive to him, and the truth to other people. Note that I say 'could have', 'cos I don't know - and more to the point, neither do you!
The paper was filming? Mwahahaha! Another lie to defend him. It was the dash cam on the bus that was running. Why invent the newspaper camera nonsense?
A set-up? Pul-ease! Not a shred of evidence for it, have you? Even if it was a setup, it was still mindless thuggery.

You're really struggling to defend this thug. Imagine Wayne Rooney laid into you for calling him a useless twat. Would that be ok?

 

Without getting into the rights and wrongs ( i easily could) it is clear that something is going to have to be dine to restore some order on here. Things seem to be getting completely out of hand. Some if the stuff being posted is borderline illegal... Just sayin........