I didn't say that it was his fault, but if you just go by the footage, then we don't know who's at fault. There are various claims of witness reports. Time will probably tell who caused the fight. I wouldn't be surprised if there was additional footage from other sources, either.
So one clear explosion with absolutely no context? That's nothing like what you'd expect from a controlled demolition, is it?
For WTC7? At what point during the video? From 1.50 on it simply proves my point. The collapse starts and the woman talking to camera doesn't even notice. She turns around when people start screaming. There's clearly no audible explosions.
On top of this how has this conspiracy managed to be kept quiet when it would have involved; * demolition experts (to lay the explosives in the WTC buildings) *security guards (allowing the explosives to be set uninterrupted) *police investigators, federal investigators as well as military investigators (to hide the truth) *the people in the government and military who planned the whole event *anyone who was there on the day and may have seen something suspicious (like medical crews, fire fighters, tv crews and reporters and the public) There would have to have been dozens if not hundreds in on the planning of this (if it was a conspiracy) plus hundreds if not thousands involved in the execution and cover up of it...it 2001 ... when cctv, computer systems, the internet, digital photography and mobile technology was widely used. They couldn't even keep Clinton spunking on that woman's dress a secret FFS.
Or he could try contacting my mate to ask him. Oh, wait a minute, he thinks he's dead. He doesn't realise he's not really, and it's all just a conspiracy!
All those people were given a free flight on American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 as an inducement.
As I said, I expect we'll get a better look soon. Going by what was said there, it sounds like the bloke followed him and was mouthing off. Whether that justified what we saw in the other video remains to be seen. Neither possibility would surprise me. The man has a history of violence, but he's also been the target of harassment. Either person could be responsible or they both could.