WTC7 was hit by debris from the other buildings. Grenfell Tower wasn't. That video is the product of Richard Gage and his group. It's been debunked many, many times. The main thing that I would point to would be the lack of reasoning behind it, though. If you're going to do something like this, when why not just blow up all three buildings? Gage thinks that the whole thing was a conspiracy, but there would be no reason for an internal group to make it that complicated. Just set the explosives, pull the trigger and blame Bin Laden. Done. Why go to the problem of adding a bunch of planes to the equation, including a ton of other factors that could go wrong? Why take that risk? What if the planes didn't hit their targets? It's simply too many possible problems which are added for no apparent reason.
How would Bin Laden get bombs in the 3 buildings ? It's easy to say that something has been debunked but I'm yet to hear anyone come out with a credible reason for the way WTC7 collapsed.
He got some of his people to fly two planes loaded with fuel into two of the buildings. That caused such damage that three buildings collapsed. Thousands of people died.
Getting back to Tommy Robinson: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html Once a football hooligan.... Check out the comments from the DM readers. He's future PM material in the world of Hopkins, Littlejohn and Oakeshott.
Al-Qaeda bombed the WTC before. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing You've heard plenty of credible explanations for WTC7 on this thread alone. You choose to believe alternative ones, though.
They were built to withstand planes hitting them Plenty of credible explanations? Debris from the other towers struck building 7 setting off office fires. The blaze from wooden desks melted the steel and it collapsed in exactly the same way as a controlled demolition ?
No, the government faked it all and flew some planes into nearby buildings, then blew another one up in a completely different way. You're right. That sounds a lot more plausible. The completely silent explosives that they used on WTC7 make it even more likely, though. Who else would have access to this revolutionary technology?
You can hear the explosions on lots of the live news footage . Interviews with fireman saying "boom boom boom boom like bombs going off" .
You can't hear the explosions on any live news footage, because there aren't any. Compare it to actual demolitions, which are amongst the first results on Google: Really loud and really obvious.
A B25 bomber crashed into the Empire state building it caught fire and is still standing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
A much smaller plane, carrying far less fuel and going at a much slower speed. You must have seen all of this stuff before: https://truthersaresanitychallenged.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/1945-empire-state-b-25-crash-vs-9-11/
