The point I made abundantly clear is people accept the official story even though both were physically impossible. To question either makes you a conspiracy theorist.
Different groups. Even Al-Qaeda think ISIS are mentalists that go too far. There are some rumours of them joining forces, but that might just be because Al-Qaeda is fading a bit.
They did all that (and the Pentagon too) so some Heebie could do an insurance job. No other explanation (even though Wiki references several reports and pictures that it WAS hit by debris from the falling towers and was on fire, as testified by several firefighters including a chief who called off putting the fires out because of safety concerns.
It patently was physically possible as it happened, try reading up on it. You can't float a conspiracy theory without outlining what supposedly lays behind it, and in this case did it encompass the entire event. You're not the sharpest knife in the block though, so I doubt you've got anything
Hey Tobes, should I lay the bait for the moon-landings again? You still got that quote from Van Allen?
Only 3 steel framed buildings have ever collapsed due to fire damage . None before none after . It's not up to me to convince ******s like yourself that buildings don't fall into themselves and I'm certainly not going to bring up all the other ridiculous stuff like an entire plane being vapourised as it hit the Pentagon melting the 2 massive titanium engines and tail section . No footage ever released from the most guarded building in the World.
If these events were unprecedented, then why would anyone use them as a smokescreen for something else? Why not just blow up the three buildings and blame Bin Laden, as he'd already attacked the WTC before?
Sisu maintained they never happened at all and it was all done with holograms and pre-planted explosives. But, I've always believed the security agencies SHOULD have known something big was about to happen, but the problem is their own incompetence and sheer data overload of trying to watch everyone everywhere. The reality is that this huge controlling hand throughout history that manipulates every facet of our society is a myth beloved with those who have father/authority issues. truth is, these agencies need watching more for issues of competence rather than any sinister overtones.
I just concentrate on the facts backed up by the World's best structural engineers and Physics professors. Many have publicly proven without a shadow of doubt that WTC7 could not collapse in the way that it did . The block in West London was burning intensely for hours and is still standing.
You're comparing two completely different buildings that underwent two entirely different events. Grenfell Tower wasn't hit by a plane. Which structural engineers and physics professors have claimed that WTC7's collapse was impossible?
They were conducting a drill with the scenario of passenger planes being hijacked at the same time it actually happened. There was even a fighter jet scrambled with one of the airliners in range and Cheney ordered the pilot not to engage. The official story is way more mental than the conspiracy theories.
I had colleagues in the North Tower. Fortunately they decided to evacuate early and they all survived. Their eyewitness accounts correspond with the official account of what happened that day.
I choose to believe eye witness accounts from dozens of people I knew well over conspiracy theories made up by strangers and posted on the internet but I'm quirky like that.
So your colleagues chose to stick around for 8 hours to watch building 7 fall down rather than go home to safety ?
