I see racist and islamophobe has popped up in the tags again. Tried and tested way of shutting down discussion with Muslims. Yawn
Funnily enough, I think Hawking has only ever made one comment on God/religion, and that (apart from re-quoting Newton on seeing the face of God), was that religion was for people scared of the dark. I did see him admonish Dawkins once though for getting involved, as a scientist, in discussions about religion. Think Hawking just can't see the point (and this car crash of a thread rather re-iterates this point). Far better, as a debater, was the late Christopher Hitchens. Some fantastic stuff on Youtube where he kicked the arses of Tony Blair and his snotty little brother. Always remember the one with Blair where he compared the tyrannies of North Korea and those of Islamic theocracies: 'You can at least die and escape from ****ing North Korea'. Miss him.
I could possibly be misunderstanding you, as I assumed you meant 'liar', which wouldn't fit what you're trying to argue, so possibly 'lier' means some thing else. You're still mistakenly thinking that the book you refer to has any credibility as reference to the wider world. It doesn't. It's just something some people like. The books I referred to are accepted as credible, but open to argument. If you want to argue agains them, feel free, but you're not in a position to simy dismiss them. That is either dishonest, or dim.
There's plenty of evidence it's based on paganism. Some has been posted on this thread. You can argue against the evidence, but you cannot simply try to ignore or dismiss it.
But paganism is the cornerstone of all religions. What were your ancestors worshipping before Muhammad? Exactly.
Always puzzles me why pointing out that Mohammed took a seven-year-old bride (but he was gracious enough to wait until she hit nine before he plugged her) is considered racist, but decrying Mormons for polygamy. I'm well aware of the historical context of the Middle Ages, before anyone kicks off, I'm aware there were pre-pubescent marriages throughout the history of the English Monarchy - nevertheless, they did usually wait until puberty before they were consummated.
Still lying then and picking up on spellings lol You have no evidence admit it and move on or provide it to back your claims...
Most, if not all science is theory. What you need to do is argue the specific parts you feel are wrong, and explain why.
Simply repeating the same nonsense, doesn't change it from being nonsense. You need to offer a proper argument.
oh look who is trying to be clever! You claimed you had factual evidence and you havent proven anything, instead latching on to someone elses post... Dishonest poster....
