This appears to clear things up. Dawkins considers, or considered himself an agnostic. If you only accept that which is provable, you're an agnostic. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...awkins-I-cant-be-sure-God-does-not-exist.html
Oh dear Typical atheist wants to go back to the attacking a persons faith than answer a simple question (where no suggestion was made just clarification sought) Oh well
I take it you disagree with it? I'd go further - as an article of faith you cannot rule out Lord Frith is real too.
You didn't ask me a question, yet you're doing exactly what you've suggested. Very dishonest, Fan. Clearly not taking Ramadan seriously.
Tbf he flip flops all over the place Has no conviction in anything he says as he changes it when questioned, or throws a tantrum This breed of atheist don't stand up to the test of time. They are a lunatic fringe who just like attacking faith
I didn't have a go at your faith. I pointed out that you're not taking it seriously. You're probably not a Muslim, anyway. Your comments suggest otherwise. Being dishonest during Ramadan? A real Muslim wouldn't do that, would they?
No. Science works on the basis that big claims need big evidence. Faith needs no evidence. Therefore the bunnies in Watership Down have as much right to Lord Frith as do we Christians/Muslims/Jews (or lapsed, in my case) to any Godhead we worship. All Dawkins is saying is that science cannot disprove God - and Faith sure as Hell (no pun intended) certainly can't prove He exists.