Off Topic Piers Morgan v Tommy Robinson

He only has to not believe in gods.

There's no other qualifying criteria dude.

 

Wait for it...

 

Can I point you to your assumption about suspecting I do not

I suggest you start reading his books and watching his vids

 

And what would I be looking for in this unfamiliar media, then?

 

I can't seem to find the video of his confusion on the issue. Am on phone will see if I still have it in my computer

 

Dawkins views on God

Thought it was obvious tbh

 

I would've thought so too, but that wouldn't make any sense at all, as he's openly an atheist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_theistic_probability

 

It's taking 'them' a long time to get to you.

 

I suspect you just wikki to prop up an argument.

Guy is fascinating, in a loony cartoonish way.

His stuff on aliens and sex is hilarious. Aliens he believes will have found religion

 

What happened to you claiming that he wasn't an atheist?
I used a Wikipedia article that quotes his work directly. You know, the thing that you told me to look into.

 

Would it annoy you if God turned out to be a womble?

I always laugh at the way he's depicted as a powerful cloud man with a big beard... He could be a Womble. Nobody has ever seen him!

Or her. It is the 21st century.

 

He is not an atheist.

Whilst you are looking at his works have a look at his views on intelligent design.


Then tell me he is atheist

 

OK. He's an atheist.

Even if he wasn't, so what? What would that demonstrate?

 

Tbf the old man in white robes and white beard, in an effort to make God more "real" backfired

 

It would prove my point you mocked earlier

He is not atheist.

 

Sticking with totally unsubstantiated claims that look utterly ridiculous, then? At least you're consistent.

 

Again proving my point from earlier about those claiming to be atheist

It must hurt you that Dawkins endorses what most of you wanna be atheists argue against.

 

He was on Al Jazeera discussing god etc. He was asked towards the end how does he know love exists can prove it, his answer was funny it was something similar to this "Course it exists, you see the little twinkle in the eyes, in the voice etc" but no evidence, the believers say "course God exists, look at the nature, the design behind it all"....

Someone tell me the difference between the two arguments...

 

What point do you think that proved? Very strange.

What has Dawkins endorsed that supposed wannabe atheists would argue against?
Even if he believed in some completely mental and baseless ****, I wouldn't care.
He's not the messiah. He totally fallible and could believe a ton of things that I don't agree with.