Agreed. Good rule. I've included a FUM league (the **** up merchant) So those making the WFU get a point for each time their WFU is validated. I'm going to award you 1 point for helping to define the rules of this league
I think the subtle WFU's is where the points are. Not everyone has Jedi skills to detect them. Those savvy amongst us will and lay claim!
I would also encourage subtle baiting of the FUM, because any subsequent blubbing about it can earn extra point too.
Always "has" been ... rightly or wrongly ... Points please Bob Edit - beaten by @BuzzardFoxMick ... no points
All I know is I'm on 2 points and I haven't forgotten the bet for Bantz wagers. I just need to compile the list, plenty time left yet
HIAG has been going ****ing mental on the Betz for Bantz thread today. I could barely keep up with all of his WFU's, so I'll have to submit a claim for them all in one go. 1. Claiming that I said 667 knows about footie so he can't be HIAG. Turns out it was Stan's comment taking the piss out of him. (3 points) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-20#post-10661400 2. Repeat of the 'fragile ego' WFU post. (1 point) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-20#post-10661460 3. Repeat of the 'fragile ego' WFU. (1 point) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-21#post-10661707 4. Claiming that by liking Stan's 667 comment (even though he missed the irony of Stan's comment) was evidence of me agreeing that 667 knew about footie . I then had to point out that by that logic me liking Milk's prior comment saying 'Welcome back HIAG' to 667 was evidence that I knew it was HIAG all along. (3 points) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-21#post-10661741 5. Repeat of the 'fragile ego' WFU (1 point) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-21#post-10661790 6. Repeat of the 'fragile ego' WFU (1 point) http://www.not606.com/threads/betz-for-bantz.348742/page-22#post-10661902 Once again, as with my previous claims I will remain impartial in the decision making process and hand it over to the lads. So please forward any objections to these claims with full details stating why. If the issue cannot be resolved then of course the panel (contact in OP) can make the final decision.
I make it 10. I'm trying not to run away with this league. So after this claim I will step back from claiming HIAG's WFU's for while to give other people a chance to claim the points.
I wouldn't ordinarily award points for a grammatical or spelling error. But seeing as the quote was a feeble attempt to wum and it was ****ed up due to the grammar error, then technically this makes it a WFU. 3 points awarded to Fosse
I claim this offer of a fight from Kustard post #117 http://www.not606.com/threads/piers-morgan-v-tommy-robinson.349370/page-6
I'm claiming another point for HIAG's repetition of the 'Fragile Ego' WFU (1 point) http://www.not606.com/threads/easiest-poster-on-the-pl-board-to-wind-up.348050/page-86#post-10664776
