Exit poll

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
twin towers was bin liner and his al queda funded mob.
I know pal? I'm talking Isis, Manchester, London, Blair...
Do you actually believe there murdering scum are really part of a movement or are they just using it as a cover for being cowardly cnuts.

1) Murdering scum
2) You don't go around blowing yourself up without believing in something. Cowardly isn't the word I'd use, brainwashed idiots springs to mind.

This is just going to get out of hand and move too far away from the point I was making about Blairs involvement and you putting him down as the best ever PM in your time, ignoring his involvement in helping give Isis a foothold
 
I know pal? I'm talking Isis, Manchester, London, Blair...


1) Murdering scum
2) You don't go around blowing yourself up without believing in something. Cowardly isn't the word I'd use, brainwashed idiots springs to mind.

This is just going to get out of hand and move too far away from the point I was making about Blairs involvement and you putting him down as the best ever PM in your time, ignoring his involvement in helping give Isis a foothold


bring back sunny jim
 
Because that was the precursor to the war on Terror that set the Bush administration back after Saddam, Gadaffi and the other middle eastern countries.
Okay... first I think the twin towers was awful, I'm not condoning what happened but it did. Bin Laden who was trained and funded by who? Wrote:

In Osama Bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America", he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indianoppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, US support of Israel, and sanctions against Iraq.

No mention of the UK but we got involved and why did we get involved, because of the twin towers or because of oil?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORZA LEEDS
Okay... first I think the twin towers was awful, I'm not condoning what happened but it did. Bin Laden who was trained and funded by who? Wrote:

In Osama Bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America", he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indianoppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, US support of Israel, and sanctions against Iraq.

No mention of the UK but we got involved and why did we get involved, because of the twin towers or because of oil?


because of oil because we need it and that's the way of it.that's why america does get involved and why they like to keep the saudis on their side.
corbyn and me wouldlove it if the world was fair and peace and love for all was the given.then we have to wake up and smell the cemtex.this is the way of the world and it's not nice.dog eat dog .ape kills ape.rotten old world is it not.
 
Okay... first I think the twin towers was awful, I'm not condoning what happened but it did. Bin Laden who was trained and funded by who? Wrote:

In Osama Bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America", he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indianoppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, US support of Israel, and sanctions against Iraq.

No mention of the UK but we got involved and why did we get involved, because of the twin towers or because of oil?
Remember Al Jazeera talking to Taliban about NZ involvement in war on terror,he had never heard of the country and just said tell them to stay out of it.<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
because of oil because we need it and that's the way of it.that's why america does get involved and why they like to keep the saudis on their side.
corbyn and me wouldlove it if the world was fair and peace and love for all was the given.then we have to wake up and smell the cemtex.this is the way of the world and it's not nice.dog eat dog .ape kills ape.rotten old world is it not.
I see where you are coming from but Corbyn world peace? The guy who said Nato was a danger to world peace and the guy who took part in a picket related to the trial of a group which included Patrick Magee, the man who was later convicted of murdering five people at the 1984 Conservative Party conference.

Corbyn is such a great judge of character, we really want him running the country don't we....
 
Always wonder why we (players) just stand and watch it, respect I guess. Would be funny if they just all turned their backs and did a moony at them
Not sure if it was England,but one country did walk upto and got right in their faces,got fined I think and fookin hammered on the pitch,not a good idea wind them up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
I see where you are coming from but Corbyn world peace? The guy who said Nato was a danger to world peace and the guy who took part in a picket related to the trial of a group which included Patrick Magee, the man who was later convicted of murdering five people at the 1984 Conservative Party conference.

Corbyn is such a great judge of character, we really want him running the country don't we....
no hes a selfish driven tree hugger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORZA LEEDS
Get a grip, where does any of that justify them or apologise for them, you do scrape the barrel a lot lately. When you make mistakes (which is often) you get quite nasty trying to defend an argument that isn't there.

Isis got a foothold because Saddaam was removed, bury your head in the sand and pretend not if you like, you do with anything else you don't agree with.

There is no justification for what isis are doing imo.
You disagree, and you are suggesting a justification above.

i am not getting nasty just saying it as i see it the same as you are. Thats the benefit of a free society isnt it?
If chesh is agreeing with you and liking your posts you must know you have made an error?