The ideal was for 'freedom'. The methods were the use of terror tactics to generate international reporting of their cause, which in turn would pressurise government concession. Does that answer your question? Should do, however I believe that you're trying to imply that I stated that their 'missions' were the same. I have no idea if this was the case. For clarity for your wee fcuked-up mind, you & I eat the 'same' food. But we don't make identical selections from the range available. Hopefully, ffs, this is within your grasp to understand, but I'm not holding my breath.
2-0 Its a ****ing rout. Chesh better get over to olofs new racist thread you might be able to bail him out.
Already quoted it once but as you're a bit slow,I will point it out again.you said (same methods)which in English means did the same things eg bombed the same things eg (women and children in shopping centres)Now will you post the examples or admit you just made up lies.
Multilingual, me! english, Scottish, Glaswegian rhyming language, & swearing. But why question which languages I speak when it's your english interpretation skills that are glaringly suspect?
Already given you a lesson on interpretation of the english language. Perhaps you should read it again. Or are there too many multi-syllable words in it for you?
So they both wanted freedom but didn't employ the same methods which means (you were talking ****) got it.
Fair enough. Even his low blows are missing. I can go to my bed now. I'll leave him with a couple of wee pictures to fester over ....
Better than having your back passage stretched by the simultainious hands of tc and mighty. #cheshthesecretwallie
No, it's something you tories aren't too familiar with - it's called FACT. And expressed in perfect english, which you clearly have little grasp of to interpret correctly. And 'Ah but' repetition nonsense will not further your argument, far less prove it!
