Yes, it could give terrorists room for recruitment if they can portray it as deliberate, which I've little doubt they've done. But again, there is no advantage for the US to be gained by deliberately bombing an innocent wedding. To claim otherwise is senseless.
You are not getting my point, that is just one example as many of these situations been happening all the time and countries messed up for their own cause and left to rot.
Whether it's true that they represent the religion isn't the point though mate, it is a fact that they are using it as their doctrine, however ****ed up their version is, it's still their version. I completely understand why you would want to completely distance these people from the religion that you live by, as you don't think they're representing Islam in any way, shape or form.
Which brings us full circle to the absolutely undeniable targeting of kids by last night's perpetrators.
That's fine, but my point still remains though, whats the difference between them and the ones that are waging the war in the name of Democracy and leaving it behind a hellhole..
Some ****house killing innocent kids at a pop concert achieves what goal in terms of a 'war'? It's just mindless terrorism not a meaningful military mission ffs. If they really want to get involved pop over to Syria or Iraq and join the brothers in arms.
Regardless where they are from, these ignorant minds can be easily manipulated using commonality and these things happen all the time not just in the Muslim circle. Evil people will do evil acts, regardless of faith or not.
Terrorism is terrorism regardless whether its done by individual or state, their point is to bring the war to the West in their own homes to go through the same thing and that has been their aim for a while now, the similar thing happened with the Tamil Tigers and many other countries.
not saying it wasn't an accident (nobody knows) but you see soldiers deliberately shooting the enemy and civilians getting punished as long as they thought they were part of the enemy. It's not beyond my imagination that someone in the army may deliberately bomb a school to get revenge.
I don't expect it's much of a comfort to know it wasn't deliberate anyway. A bombed child is a bombed child.
Sorry, no proof that was deliberate targeting of kids. Probably another **** up, the yanks are good at those. What happened last night was pre planned, callous, and undeniably deliberately aimed at kids. It's you that's trying to deny the truth.
Muslim organisations in Leicester condemn Manchester Arena terror attack By Tom_Mack | Posted: May 23, 2017 The spokesman for Muslim organisations in Leicester has condemned last night's attack in Manchester. While no terrorist group has yet claimed responsibility for what happened in the foyer of The fact you lump my name in with your 'surprise', shows you are one of a number of clueless ****s, but this is hardly the thread to explain why. EDIT. The first half of this reply was what I started to post earlier, but got interrupted. It should help point to why you are wrong in your opinion.
agree, the difference is one is being justified as "collateral damage and one isn't", which I find wrong.
I would be assuming but it could be many things, their roots, religion or political goal to say its Islam is far to simplistic.
Yes, like theres nothing to be gained with Guantanamo Bay or with killing of civilians which has happened in probably all of the countries that we have invaded. It still doesn't stop it happening though anyway.
It's not impossible, but to call it far fetched is being kind. More likely it's yet another yank **** up. They're good at those. As my old grandad used to say, 'they kill more of their own allies than they do the enemy'
