The 5 year dormant account, who spookily sparked into life on the very day that you got banned, and then disappeared the evening before you came back.
I don't know who that 667 character is; I've never seen him on here before, or on the Spurs board. I agree that his turning up during my absence was very suspicious! I still think it's one of you lot having a joke at my expense (as usual). No way would an Arsenal fan be that kind and sensitive to a Yid!
Come off it, Tobias! If you are going to set me up isn't that exactly how you would do it? In any event, shortly before our unjust bannings, Saints and I were posting on here at the same time, often with posts made at exactly the same time, and that still didn't stop the Neanderthals from spouting the same old repetitive **** about us being the same poster. So, what difference would it make if 667 was posting at the same time as me? Answer: no difference, at all.
http://www.not606.com/threads/hiag-saints.348239/page-4#post-10556303 The non-HIAG nickname that I loved was "Skyrimmer!" Was that yours? Superb!! Sky was livid with that one! http://www.not606.com/threads/hiag-saints.348239/page-8#post-10556838 You didn't have to reply, my friend. I'm hoping that people will be able to refrain from the same kind of nonsense when the HIAGster returns. It would be nice to think that we can all bury our differences and learn to get along (with the odd bit of banter along the way)!! http://www.not606.com/threads/hiag-saints.348239/page-2#post-10556068 Do you live near Basingstoke? I may have stopped off in a lay-by there once The case for the prosecution rests Ma'Lud
**** off! I'm being framed! The HIAGster! What the **** is that all about? Come on! This is so obviously a set up!
Every single one of his posts was about you. He logged in after a 5 year absence, just to read your I'm off thread and provide a commentary on it. Then ****ed off Obvious shenanigans going on. Not saying it was deffo you, but if not then it was someone who wanted us to think that.
I've been reading some of the comments, and it is crystal clear to me that 667 has posted in order to make it look like he's something to do with me, either directly or by close association. I genuine believed that it was one of you lot. Looking at his profile, it does seem like he's been around for a while, so he could be genuine, which would make it all quite disturbing!
please log in to view this image .... read this (will stop you making a tit of yourself with fishing analogies) ... no need to thank me please log in to view this image #HowToAvoidSticklebacks&Minnows
Coming out clean....I was 667 I threw a few aggressive posts at 'him' and he only responded with 'likes'. That was to throw you boys off the scent. The fact that he responded with 'likes' should have got a bell ringing in the Grey matter. I wasn't interested in conversing with myself...I was just wumming you boys. However, now that Hiag seems to be getting blamed for it, I think it's a good time to own up. It was me...well I thought it was funny.
