Ok so a picture of a ****ing medal means nothing if you cannot prove you own it ffs. Piskie, he has said numerous times his name isn't Tyler, so no need to push that issue. But a picture of a medal means **** all HIAG. It needs to be a picture of a 2004 San Francisco Marathon medal that you can conclusively prove is owned by you, so something extra needs to be in it, like a note that says "HIAG's medal" or some ****. Don't pretend a medal will prove anything on its own and be a dipshit, when you know damn ****ing well it will prove nothing. And Piskie stop pushing that it has to say Tyler when he has said a million times he was talking **** and that isn't his name......
That's what I am going to do, mate. I'm going to add a few other touches, too. Things that you will pick up from what I've been writing on this board for some time. Trust me, I will leave you in absolutely no doubts whatsoever that it is my medal.
So all this has been about Tiny Todger downloading a pic from google and claiming it as his own without verification? He's off his rocker!
ffs, Bodi, mate! Not this again. Being "one of the lads" isn't something you or I can choose. It's a state of mind; a matter of fact. You know who the lads are, mate. The list includes some people that you might find surprising, too. It isn't determined by whether or not these people are perceived to be on my side, either.
I am firmly on the side of non spastication, personally. Though it is in short supply on this website these days
Not 606 Glossary; Rimmers: Any Spurs fan other than Bald Archie or RCL. Players: Those that string Tiny along pretending to be on side. The Afflicted: Rufus McDufus The Lads: Everybody else apart from the above.
.. your lads seem to have deserted you on your recent poll Quentin...would you like to borrow some of mine? ...perhaps the Hull lads? ...I know they appreciate your 'unique' brand of err ...humour
Take out NSIS and insert Skylarker and that's about it ...Rufus has a soft spot for HIAG but he's just nuts and will fight the corner of the needy ...bless him.
My initial comment about the whole issue was that HIAG was bullshitting, because I showed that nobody called Tyler ran the 2004 SF marathon. I said at the time he was either bullshitting about being called Tyler, or running the marathon... and quite likely both. He then went off on his usual pissy fit about it all. He's already conceded that he was bullshitting about being called Tyler, so I was right to call BS. Whatever other ****e he comes out with over the weekend doesn't really make any difference to the initial link I posted, but it should be fun seeing him squirm all the same
Like I have said many times to him, when he has bullshitted about almost everything else, he can hardly complain when people do not believe his other claims, be they true or not.
HIAG's bullshit is very easy to spot, because he makes such simple school boy errors. He claimed his name was Tyler, then when I showed nobody called Tyler ran, he was like 'oh I only said I was called Tyler as a wind up', like you would !? Then he called the SF marathon 'a breeze' when it's known as the Race that all Marathoners fear because of all the hills. When this was pointed out to him, apparently the year he ran it, they moved the course and ran it on the flat, despite the whole city being built on a series of hills Then he couldn't find his medal, then his wife found it, then it was lost again in the garage, then he suddenly had to go away on business. Then it was the fact he had to give up running because of an Achilles injury, but he forgot that on another thread he'd said he had to give up running because of his Hamstring injury, and now he has to go to Moscow His whole story has more holes than a swiss cheese. I can't wait to see what ****e he comes out with on the weekend
