^^^^ rattled Might have something to do with the fact that only 140,000 people live on IOW compared to 900,000 whole live in San Francisco. Maybe you need to do some maths As I say, you have no idea whether I could run either of those marathons, or indeed whether I already have. There is as much evidence on here that I have run them, as there is that you have run them.
I can imagine. Far too much water near the IOW for it to be easy. Given the choice I'd do the San Fran.
The San Francisco marathon, known as 'The race that all marathoners fear' is a breeze according to HIAG.
Exactly, you 'think' you do. Although there is as much evidence of you running in the San Francisco Marathon on here as there is for me having run it. In fact I can say categorically, that I ran in San Francisco in 2012 and again in 2015
But this is HIAG (confirmed) running the IOW marathon, so I suspect he's being truthful about it being a 'breeze'. please log in to view this image
I did the Weymouth marathon in 2010. It's a night time solo event and you have to wear a mask. It's a tough one tbf, lot's of garden jumping involved. It's kinda cruel though as if you don't make it they send you to prison
I did a 50 mile walking road race* once and it nearly killed me. *also the annual London Stock Exchange to Brighton race**. **there were some nutters who crossed the line and turned round and raced back - proper ****ing mentalists
I'd agree with that statement, too. I entered the San Fran Marathon believing that it was going to be harder than most. It probably is - I have only ever run two marathons, so I cannot compare it with other marathons. But I ran the IOW marathon two or three months before it, and I am telling you that the IOW marathon is a far, far harder event. In comparison, the San Fran marathon was easier. That is a fact.
Probably fueled by cocaine if it was a stock brokers race. They're probably still running tbh, take a look out the window
