That is all well and good, Bodi, but I am going to post irrefutable proof that that I (not HIAG/Tyler) ran the 2004 San Fran Marathon. It won't come down to whether or not you believe what HIAG tells you. The hard facts will be staring you in the face. Pixie will deny those at his peril.
Thats what Pixie has done, but you are having a go at him for it, and demanding an apology upon proof!
That isn't the case. I have asserted that I have proof that I (not HIAG/Tyler - both of whom only exist on this forum) ran the 2004 San Fran Marathon. When - not before - I have posted irrefutable proof of that fact, I expect a full and unreserved apology from Pixie. You and I both know that he will never bring himself to do that. Whether or not you lads condemn him for that, I have to leave up to you and your own consciences, after you have each made an assessment of the proof. I am confident that you will see, without any question, that Pixie has zero wriggle-room.
You still dont get it. By your own admission, you talk **** and we should take everything you say with a pinch of salt. So why would Piskie, upon proof that, in this one instance, you are speaking the truth, be required to apologise, when he has every right to doubt your claim, due to the very precedent you have set yourself AND admit to?
There is nothing to "get," Bodi. But if there was, I would get it. No, I haven't admitted to that. My assertion is that you only know about me those things that I have told you; and since you cannot know what is and isn't true, it is best that you believe nothing. That isn't an admission that I am "talking ****," but simply a statement of the nature of how things play out on these public forums. Because it will be irrefutable proof that I ran the 2004 San Francisco Marathon. You need to look up the definition of "irrefutable," Bod. As I have demonstrated, that isn't the case.
So we have a 58 year old rock god called Hoddle is a gimp but in reality is called Tyler which are false by his own admission. He gets picked up by helicopters and runs marathons in between being killed in a car crash but later it was found to just be a stiff neck. He has two children aged 12, 10 & 6 and is a millionaire lawyer who has a penchant for the high life at Harvesters restaurants with 40% off vouchers and drives a Rover 25 but is really a cut n shut Peugeot 305. He is also a Southampton season ticket holder but supports Spurs. But now offers irrefutable proof that he ran the San Fran marathon? There's only one thing that's true about the above and that is the guys a raving idiot and total fantasist.
^^^^ Rattled I challenged you as to why nobody called Tyler ran in the 2004 San Francisco marathon, because you claimed that both were true. I even quoted you saying 'I have told you the truth, Pix' Since then you have wriggled and squirmed, posted a google images photoshopped pic of somebody else's medals from Hawaii, squirmed some more and ended up trying to claim that it was only your ****ing internet alter ego that said he ran the marathon, so that somehow lets you off the hook And you still haven't posted the proof of your medals that you've been saying you will do for 3 days now. Get on with it Tyler ...
I'll be here as long as needed to keep this thread derailed To be fair, this one's only just warming up. HIAG's only been squirming for 7 pages so far, this one could have a while to run yet. Tyler could just end it all by posting proof of his name and his 2004 SF medal of course
Not to worry, Libby. I'm going to post irrefutable proof this weekend that I ran the 2004 San Francisco Marathon. Get ready for Pixie's desperate attempt to avoid a full and unreserved apology. I hope that you and the rest of the lads are going to give the welching-bottler hell?
