I have always had the tendency to refer to HIAG in the third person. You will recall my very firm assertion that HIAG is nothing more than virtual persona, an internet dummy. The mind behind HIAG (and, trust me, it is a thoroughly devious mind) makes the lips move, and thinks up words to say, but it's all an illusion, nonetheless. HIAG does not really exist. He is called Tyler.
We need proof that you, Tyler ran the 2004 San Francisco marathon. I hope this 'HIAG is a virtual persona' bollocks isn't an attempt to try and wriggle out of it ? No bottling please
It goes without saying that HIAG is an online persona. I dont think anyone seriously thought your real name was "Hoddle is a God". And besides, if you were as big a pair of ****ing clown shoes in real life as you are on here, then you'd be living in your parents house and have no teeth, where regular people have become irritated by your never ending bollocks and punched them all out.
There will be no names, Pix. What there will be is a photograph that will make it patently clear that only I could have posted it - ie. not found it on the internet. It is already expected by the lads that you will attempt to wriggle out of an admission of your ****-wummery and pathetically avoid offering a full and unreserved apology.
The first rule of Not606 is: You do not talk about Not606. Chuck Palahnuick's writing's gone in a very weird direction.
I am, personally. But I think you have few fans these days outside of your fellow Spursians, who are required to back you by default.
Oh, I don't know, Bods. The pantomime villain may get all the boos, but he is the one that the crowds turn up to see.
Not good enough mate. You claimed your name is Tyler and you ran in the 2004 San Francisco marathon. If you can't prove both of those things then you will confirm your status as a bullshitter
That is incorrect. I said (and repeat here) that HIAG ran these events. It doesn't concern you whom HIAG really is. My proof will be incontrovertible.
So you are trying to use the excuse that because your online persona didn't run the 2004 SF Marathon, that somehow absolves you of bullshitting about it keep on wriggling
There is no wriggling on my part. HIAG is going to show you his medals, and other items, within a context that you will simply be unable to deny as proof that the person who is HIAG ran those events. You will, of course, wriggle and attempt to provide a reason for refusing to make a full and unreserved apology, but the lads will call you a bottler, and they will know that you are, indeed, a bottler.
So basically, you are going to show us something that proves probably **** all (there is always some sort of caveat with you) and you will pre empt the protests by saying this.
No caveats. No wriggling out of anything. I will post a photo of my medals and it will be evident from that photo that it is current, and unique to me. Pixie previously asked me to photograph the medals next to a note that has "HIAG's medals" written on it. I will certainly do that, and more. Pixie, of course, knowing the extreme amount of **** that he is in, is already trying to wriggle out of it by insisting that I post my name (which he knows I will not do), but that is irrelevant. All I need prove is that I have these medals, which I will do.
