Arsene Wenger

No thanks.

 

All I know is the 'invincible's' weren't actually invincible...

I think they need a dictionary at La'Arse.

 

I think Turdy would be best placed to comment on the Gimps sucking technique.

 

Where did the name 'turdy' come from?

It's very childish 'skid marks'.

 

pot kettle

 

AFTER the the first season the Russian showed up ( squeezing the Gunners out of the " Best of the Rest " ) Arsenal haven't won a title since , not a rocket surgery post piskie . You should know well enough about " Sugar Daddies " as Norris was the " Original " sugar daddy . in 1929 , he was banned for extra payments to players and buying success , the Gunners went on to win 4 of the next 6 titles ... two illegal activities in a decade that started in 1919 . Most of Arsenal's " Store Bought Success " at the time should have a black mark beside it IMO.

 

Unbeaten in the league. According to HIAG they 'fluked' it .....

 

In fact you could call it.......Arbitrary

 

I would , if I knew what that meant .

 

Ask @PISKIE

 

Arsenal won their titles in the 30's down to the brilliance of Herbert Chapman, not because Arsenal sacked Norris the previous decade. Claiming Norris 'bought' the success Arsenal had in the 30's is almost as dumb as the claim that George Graham should be credited with Arsenal's title win in 2004.

 

Thats two dumb arses now.

 

Norris put 15 million pounds of his own money into buying Arsenal success , some of it illegally and is why he got the boot . !5 million pounds doesn't seem like much but 15 million pounds is what an average team spent for the whole team at the time . There was a maximum weekly wage rule that he broke .

 

Wrong, he was sacked from Arsenal for pocketing money from the till. He was banned from football for making illegal payments to players.

None of the money he invested into Arsenal was done 'illegally' unless you have some proof otherwise ?

 

What part of SOME of the money was spent illegally don't you understand , who's money do you think was paid under the table " Illegally " for players wages that the FA gave him the boot for . The proof is " The Boot " . The rest was spent in the " Sugar Daddy " way I eluded too from the beginning

 

The illegal payment was made to a Sunderland player, not invested into Arsenal as you have claimed.
Get your facts straight before you start spouting crap

 

I've made no such claim , I said he made illegal payments to players , wish in turn bought success .

 

You said that he invested money into Arsenal, some of it illegally. What part of that investment was illegal ?