In fairness that's good for both of us.
yes it would be, just i am not convinced that the stadium will provide that big a boost.
In fairness that's good for both of us.
Give him 5 years and come back to me£22m invested in the squad
£0m invested in the stadium
How can other PL clubs compete with that?

So how big a boost do you think Big Stand will give you lot?yes it would be, just i am not convinced that the stadium will provide that big a boost.
Give him 5 years and come back to me
(how much do you think your owners will get for Coutinho to "invest" in the squad?)
So how big a boost do you think Big Stand will give you lot?
So how big a boost do you think Big Stand will give you lot?
Lukaku, he will be a very sought after player this summer with a good choice of top clubs to go to.Who do you think will move club first: Lukaku, Zlatan or Coutinho?
Who do you think will move club first: Lukaku, Zlatan or Coutinho?
Exactly, that is why clubs improve their grounds or build new ones. You have to provide great facility's these days, people expect it, grounds and stands aren't built to make a club "elite", thay are built out of necessity to help attract and keep the punters.bit more finances but thats about all
What do you think of £50m for VVD, a young CH who is performing as well as any CH in the PL every game with a good 10 years ahead of him and still time to improve?
So for the next 8.5 years nothing then?An extra £20m a year from the 8500 additional seats

I would contest that one, he is a very good player for his age and price.Not a fan of spending so much when success depends on teamwork and systems but certainly far better value than Stones, Sterling, Bailly, or Pogba
He definitely leads himself on that scoreAnyone else getting pissed off by the overuse of 'fraud', 'nailed on' and other such words used on this board recently? All your fault @astro, you're just a natural leader I think.

So for the next 8.5 years nothing then?
£170m/£20m=8.5 weird innit how it equals the number of seats![]()
I would contest that one, he is a very good player for his age and price.
TBH I have read so many different figures on here I just went for the last one (last week), the first one I read was £70m.It cost £115m not £170m, but even 8.5 years is over 3 decades sooner than Everton will pay off their stadium, which will give them an additional 9800 seats BTW

Ah stats, the last refuge of a person who doesn't watch games£30m for 5 clean sheets this season in a team set up for anti-football is very good?

Ah stats, the last refuge of a person who doesn't watch games
You do realise he isn't the only defender on the field (a bit like Stones in that way) and has missed quite a few games through ACON and injury?
Nope I am judging him on watching him play, you should try it sometime.That's why I'm not generally a fan of big money defenders. In attack individuals create goals but in defence they concede goals.
So what part of him costing £30m and not doing his job is a good deal? Like Stones you're judging him on [HASHTAG]#potential[/HASHTAG] while paying him the fee and wages of someone who actually delivers?