Here you go again comparing you leaving your children ( I'm guessing all above 10 years old at least ) who actively took the decision to ask to be allowed to go off under the supervision of trained staff members during the day to engage in activities , to the Mccanns who left 1 year old twins alone with their 3 year old sister at 9pm . You really can't be that ignorant to not know the two scenarios are not the same so I don't know why you keep comparing them . Would you leave a pair of 1 year old babies with a 3 year alone in those circumstances ? You have pretty much admitted you wouldn't, why would that be ? Because as a father you know that is very risky selfish neglectful and in the UK illegal. To question why the Mccanns did or questioning the very sketchy "abduction theory" they have forced down our throats makes the person a scumbag troll ? Therefore shutting down the conversation a tactic used by many that refuse to listen to logic and reason .
No actual legal age ... Just guidelines. I guess it depends on how mature n responsibility a child is whether they can be left alone or to look after other kids. I'll revise me post to be clearer .
There is no minimum age at which children in the UK can be left on their own, nor do laws specify how old someone needs to be to babysit. However, if the babysitter is under 16, then the parent remains legally responsible for the child's safety. Bit of a grey area. But are you saying if I leave my near 15 year old 5 foot 11 son at home and go over the road for a few pints I'm a scumbag?
Sounds like wishful thinking Ive revised my post ... It depends on level of maturity n responsibility And circumstance
Pud you've just had a wean after very unfortunate previous so I know you're thinking very protective. When he gets to 14 you'll be toeing his arse out the door.
What the **** is wrong with you people? When my kids were tots and we went on holiday they were telt straight,.yoos wee bastarts are on yer own. Don't ****ing bother me for the next 12/14 days. We are all inclusive so help yerself to grub and drinks (.stay aff the spirits until at least 5pm) and dinne bother me unless yer drooning or sommit. Weans these days are jist pampered ****s.
Do you honestly think anything you have said stands up to logic and reason? There is nothing sketchy or theoretical about the abduction. If anything is sketchy or theoretical it is expecting anyone to believe that in the midst of an evening in a public place surrounded by friends and holiday makers that the parents killed their child, hid the body then called the Police, returned at some later date and disposed of the kid. Did they just slip out of a press conference, drive into the hills and bury Maddie in a shallow grave then hightail it back just so the mum could grab the teddy in time for the BBC interview? Imagination can only be stretched so far before it snaps and drops off the edge into lunatic conspiracy theories. To mongs and scumbags I have to add cretins. We live in an age where any moron with a Twitter account can spout off nonsense and accusations with absolutely no comebacks, all the while thinking that their opinion has more to do with events that the trivial matter of actual facts getting in the way. And of course the Mum was a Wid. I'd ride it like a bike without stabilisers. Slow at first, quicker with practice and eventually with no hands and a lolly stick in the forks.
