wtf are you talking about? Are you seriously trying to say no one can be convicted of murder (or even found guilty of disposing of a body) when the body has never been found? Catch a ****ing grip.
Corpus delicti my friend. Not since the 1950s has a body been nèeded for a person to be convicted of murder.
It would be a bit awkward for all those politicians, police and special branch officers if the McCanns were brought to trial
It's a BIG conspiracy. The McCanns were swingers They killed her on purpose/accidently to cover up the fact they were swingers (because that’s exactly the sort of thing two middle-class Doctors would do) They also managed to scrub the whole crime scene free of any incriminating evidence of Maddie’s death They also managed to get their 9 friends to go along with this cover up After she died they moved her body and hid it for 3 weeks, all under the spotlight of the Portuguese police and watching media Then after 3 weeks they moved the body again (using a hire car) to another secret location, again all under the spotlight of the Portuguese police and watching media The Government know all this and they are covering it up Scotland Yard are also in on the cover up. OR She was snatched from the flat by person or persons unknown and the Portuguese police completely ****ed up the investigation from the start. Occam’s razor
What does Occams razor say about spending money raised to find your kid on defending your NAME in a foreign country?
Conspiracy best describes the Tapas diners . https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=c...oid-orange-gb&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Must have been a good copper, he thinks the parents are innocent, to **** with trials and juries with dev on the beat! Guessing them professional classes stick together any other stoooopid **** would have been banged up - it wasn't me guv....honest
No I'm not stop being stoooopid...Guessing you think they are innocent without a shred of reasonable evidence to support your argument? So do you think they should have been trialled for neglect? Any other parents would have had social services at their door.
Now stoopid's slightly less stoopid response, at no time have i commented on the conspiracies theories you highlight, all i've suggested is they were negligent. What ever the right's and wrong's of that it still equals the same. As for anything more, we will never know. However, an eye witness even in support of the parents appear to suggest and contradict themselves, saying how safe and secure the place seemed, yet on an earlier note, state they would have not wanted to be in that specific room because it appeared less secure in sense of location on the site (not those exact words). It's just a shame that the couple never felt the same insecurities when leaving the children alone. Did the parents kill their own child, how will we ever know, unless your psychic Dev, and until such time as proven otherwise an element of guilt will always remain.
You certainly seem intent on proving me correct. You don't have a trial to prove people are innocent, you first need compelling evidence that they are guilty to go to trial in the first place. Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.
