On a real then can you decipher between a valid observation/criticism of Chelsea and a straight up wum? Plus what's the difference between Hiag wumming Chelsea and say CFC wumming Spurs...my point is light hearted wumming is part of the game.....its unfair if everyone can participate in it but if Hiag does he's getting steamrolled. That's something individuals might need to consider? because I've seen valid opinions get shot down due to who says them. Criticism of Leicester being a prime example even though the whole country is doing it.
Maybe its because he does so much of it. CFC does like to wind other London clubs up for sure but he's never abusive with it. He plants the bomb and waits for the ensuing mayhem. He's a class act at it but I've never seen where his been abusive with people, he never calls people twat or idiot or 'get your knob out on the bus'. There lies the difference in class between the two, with regards to the gimp he wums other clubs and people more than any other poster on this forum. In truth thats why he's not liked by others than his own.
You've just mentioned he who can't now be mentioned (apparently)... Lord Mouldyshorts ... shame on you ... PS is the bus the same bus that he who can't be mentioned refers to freqently? the one he frequents in the hope of seeing another man with his cock out?
... no worries buddy ... when you've got 173 votes in a forum poll like me, you don't need to crave attention constantly like some of the melts on here do