Eugh.....I mention a **** and you jump straight to 'arse rippings' hold ya horses Skiddy, not heard of foreplay?
You strike me as a guy who would dearly love to engage in foreplay but waited too long for the other three to turn up.
@Spurlock @Ginger Marks ... for those of a nostalgic bent (no innuendo intended ... well perhaps just a smidgen)
Skiddy and my main man exuding words of brotherly love... I thought I would never see the day. I am lost for words, almost. Mind you, I'm betting that it's going to be a short-lived thing, when Skiddy gets his cock out and begins screaming "WHAT TIME DO YOU CALL THIS!"
Never mind Saints I forgive you for being a uber fcukwit and forum spoiler and I promise I won't mention it again.
He could always ask you ... do you still have that clock that you said was ticking towards the bans that brb was going to be handing out during VegasGate? ... the one where you kept on quoting each hour as it went by? ... what happened with that? .. . was anyone banned in the end? We did have a lot of fun back then didn't we? ... before it all got a bit too serious
I was referring to my first contribution to that thread which was about pundits mate i.e. this one; Hoddle is a god like pundit. Surprised you swerved that one like
And how is that relevant, sheep? What is relevant is that you called it a '**** thread' yet joined in on discussion on that very same thread after the masses, you usually follow, had commented on it
Seriously dude ... there is only one other poster on here who puts unecessary commas into sentences like the ones highlighted above
The relevance is, that it was a pisstake post, as I previously stated and as you then chose to challenge, as you'd skipped past it. You therefore failed Happy to help. Your desperation is tangible btw, poor effort this HIAG.
Very unlikely IMHO ... very different posting styles ... @Tobes usually addresses all points raised in posts rather than selectively ignoring certain ones for which a response might be further damning ... style wise very different.... but I'm no expert ... (or am I?)
You actually said you'd made "a couple" of pisstake posts before making a genuine contribution, thus implying that calling it a **** thread (your second post on the thread) was also a pisstake Despite your pitiful attempts to deflect at the end of the day your antics on that thread are undeniably as follows Calling the thread "a **** thread, go **** yourself" And then some time later making a genuine contribution after many ( ie a crowd) had commented on that thread. This is in black and white and cannot be questioned. Whether it renders you a sheep is however up for debate. It is in line with your bandwagoning regarding the politics thread, pursuing hiag and claiming me and HIAG are the same poster ( a u turn having denied it previously but changed your mind in line with a crowd) It's pretty conclusive from where I sit
